首页> 外文OA文献 >Prediction of in-situ asphalt mixture density using ground penetrating radar: theoretical development and field verification
【2h】

Prediction of in-situ asphalt mixture density using ground penetrating radar: theoretical development and field verification

机译:利用探地雷达预测原位沥青混合料密度:理论发展和现场验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In-situ asphalt mixture density is critically important to the performance of flexible pavements: density that is too high, or too low, may cause early pavement distresses. Traditionally, two methods have been commonly used for in-situ asphalt mixture density measurement: laboratory testing on field-extracted cores, and in-situ nuclear gauge testing. However, both these methods have limitations. The coring method damages pavement, causes traffic interruption, and only provides limited data at discrete locations. The nuclear gauge method also provides limited data measurement. Moreover, it requires a license for the operators because it uses radioactive material. To overcome the limitations of these traditional methods, this study proposes to develop a nondestructive method of using ground penetrating radar (GPR) to measure in-situ asphalt mixture density accurately, continuously, and rapidly.The prediction of asphalt mixture density using GPR is based on the fact that the dielectric constant of an asphalt mixture, which can be measured by GPR, is dependent on the dielectric and volumetric properties of its components. According to the electromagnetic (EM) mixing theory, two candidate specific gravity models, namely the modified complex refractive index model (CRIM) and the modified Bottcher model, were developed to predict the bulk specific gravity of asphalt mixture from its dielectric constant. To evaluate the performance of these two models, a full-scale six-lane test site with four sections in each lane was carefully designed and constructed. Forty cores were extracted from the test site, and their densities were measured in the laboratory and compared to the GPR-predicted values using the two models. Both models were found effective in predicting asphalt mixture density, although the modified Bottcher model performed better. To account for the effect of the non-spherical inclusions in asphalt mixture and further improve the density prediction accuracy, a shape factor was introduced into the modified Bottcher model. Nonlinear least square curve fitting of the field core data indicated that a shape factor of -0.3 provided the best-performance model, which is referred to as the Al-Qadi Lahouar Leng (ALL) model. The performance of the ALL model was validated using data collected from an active pavement construction site in Chicago area. It was found that when the ALL model was employed, the prediction accuracy of the GPR was comparable to, or better than, that of the traditional nuclear gauge. For the asphalt mixtures without slags, the average density prediction errors of GPR were between 0.5% and 1.1% with two calibration cores, while those of the nuclear gauge were between 1.2% and 3.1%. Due to the importance of the accurate input of the dielectric constant of asphalt mixture to the prediction accuracy of the specific gravity model, this study also looked into alternative methods for asphalt mixture dielectric constant estimation. The extended common mid-point (XCMP) method using two air-coupled antenna systems was developed, and its implementation feasibility was explored. The XCMP method was found to provide better performance than the traditional surface-reflection method for thick pavement structures with multi-lifts. However, for thin pavement layers (less than 63 mm thick), the accuracy of this method could be improved. Factors accounting for the accuracy reduction for a thin surface layer include the sampling rate limitation of the GPR systems, as well as the possible overlap of the GPR signal reflections at the surface and bottom of the thin asphalt layer.
机译:原地沥青混合料的密度对于柔性路面的性能至关重要:密度过高或过低,可能会导致路面早期损坏。传统上,两种方法通常用于原位沥青混合料的密度测量:现场提取岩心的实验室测试和原位核规测试。但是,这两种方法都有局限性。取芯方法会损坏路面,导致交通中断,并且仅在离散位置提供有限的数据。核规方法还提供了有限的数据测量。此外,由于它使用放射性物质,因此需要为操作员颁发许可证。为了克服这些传统方法的局限性,本研究提出了一种使用地面穿透雷达(GPR)来准确,连续和快速地测量原位沥青混合料密度的无损方法。可以通过GPR测量的沥青混合料的介电常数取决于其组分的介电和体积性质。根据电磁(EM)混合理论,开发了两种候选比重模型,即改进的复数折射率模型(CRIM)和改进的Bottcher模型,以根据其介电常数预测沥青混合料的体积比重。为了评估这两种模型的性能,精心设计和建造了一个全尺寸六车道试验场,每条车道有四个部分。从测试地点提取了40个岩心,并在实验室中测量了它们的密度,并使用这两个模型将其与GPR预测的值进行了比较。尽管修改后的Bottcher模型表现更好,但两个模型都可有效预测沥青混合料的密度。为了解决沥青混合料中非球形夹杂物的影响并进一步提高密度预测精度,将形状因子引入了改进的Bottcher模型。场核心数据的非线性最小二乘曲线拟合表明,形状因子-0.3提供了最佳性能模型,该模型被称为Al-Qadi Lahouar Leng(ALL)模型。使用从芝加哥地区活跃的人行道施工现场收集的数据验证了ALL模型的性能。结果发现,当采用ALL模型时,GPR的预测精度可与传统核规相媲美,甚至更好。对于不含矿渣的沥青混合料,使用两个校准芯时,GPR的平均密度预测误差在0.5%至1.1%之间,而核规的平均密度预测误差在1.2%至3.1%之间。由于沥青混合料介电常数的准确输入对比重模型预测精度的重要性,因此,本研究还探讨了沥青混合料介电常数估算的替代方法。开发了使用两个空气耦合天线系统的扩展通用中点(XCMP)方法,并探讨了其实现可行性。发现XCMP方法比传统的表面反射方法在具有多提升量的厚路面结构上具有更好的性能。但是,对于较薄的路面层(小于63毫米厚),可以提高此方法的准确性。造成薄表层精度降低的因素包括GPR系统的采样率限制,以及沥青薄层表面和底部的GPR信号反射可能重叠。

著录项

  • 作者

    Leng Zhen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号