首页> 外文OA文献 >How Public Is the Internet? A Conversation on the Nature of Human Interactions On-line and the Implications for Research Methods
【2h】

How Public Is the Internet? A Conversation on the Nature of Human Interactions On-line and the Implications for Research Methods

机译:互联网如何公开?人际交往性质的在线对话及对研究方法的启示

摘要

In the past decade, ???virtual??? research???empirical investigations conducted via the Internet???has increased dramatically across a variety of disparate disciplines. Areas such as cybersecurity and encryption, digital government and citizenship, consumer health informatics, and user behavior in online spaces have emerged to become signature iSchool research areas, often shared with particular disciplinary heritages (e.g., computer science, political science and communication, public health, and sociology???respectively, but not exclusively). In addition, the field of Information Science is dominated by research developing or using emerging technologies. These new technologies often occupy a gray area in which ethical issues either have not been sufficiently well-defined or push against existing definitions. Questions surrounding the ???public??? nature of the internet and Web 2.0-era information technologies have also emerged and have become increasingly urgent given the tightening of federal, state and University regulations as they relate to the protection of human subjects. At the convergence of multiple disciplinary and methodological perspectives, Information Science researchers are well-positioned to become more active participants in both scholarly and institutional conversations regarding the appropriate risks and benefits that participants in online research studies might be subject to. Critiques of IRB inconsistencies exist, what we need is a thoughtful and thorough community response to the innately complex nature of virtual research and a map which can guide us towards the future and the study of twenty-first century systems, selves and societies. Our goal for this wildcard event, is to generate a lively and rigorous debate which accomplishes the following three goals: 1) extends the dialogue within the Information Science field concerning the beneficence and respect for participants in online research; 2) enumerates a set of best practices for iSchool researchers in relation to conducting approved research on-line and; 3) moves us towards the process of drafting an iSchool set of ethical guidelines related to virtual research.
机译:在过去的十年中,“虚拟”研究通过互联网进行的实证研究在各种不同的学科中已大大增加。网络安全和加密,数字政府和公民身份,消费者健康信息学以及在线空间中的用户行为等领域已成为iSchool的标志性研究领域,通常与特定的学科遗产(例如,计算机科学,政治科学和传播,公共卫生)共享,以及社会学??此外,信息科学领域以开发或使用新兴技术为主导。这些新技术通常处于一个灰色的区域,在该区域中,道德问题要么没有得到充分定义,要么违反了现有定义。围绕“公众”的问题互联网和Web 2.0时代信息技术的性质也已出现,并且由于联邦,州和大学与人类保护相关的法规日益严格,这种技术已经变得越来越迫切。在多种学科和方法论观点的融合下,信息科学研究人员处于有利位置,可以更加积极地参与有关在线研究研究参与者可能遭受的适当风险和利益的学术和机构对话。存在对IRB不一致的批评,我们需要的是对虚拟研究固有的复杂性进行周到而透彻的社区反应,以及一张可以指导我们迈向未来和研究二十一世纪系统,自我和社会的地图。我们针对此通配符事件的目标是引发一场生动而严谨的辩论,以实现以下三个目标:1)扩大信息科学领域内有关在线研究参与者的忠诚度和尊重的对话; 2)列举了iSchool研究人员在进行批准的在线研究方面的一系列最佳实践,并且; 3)使我们朝着起草与虚拟研究有关的iSchool道德规范集的过程前进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号