首页> 外文OA文献 >Should developing countries take on binding commitments in a climate agreement? A cost-benefit analysis
【2h】

Should developing countries take on binding commitments in a climate agreement? A cost-benefit analysis

机译:发展中国家是否应在气候协定中承担具有约束力的承诺?成本效益分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper explores the costs and benefits for all parties to a future climate agreement of developing countries taking on binding commitments. Such commitments would allow developing countries to participate in emissions trading, which has significantly lower transaction costs than the present Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Thus we analyse whether the efficiency gains obtained by participating in emissions trading can offset the economic risk (due to the fact that future emissions cannot be known) incurred by taking on binding commitments. We use a dynamic computable general equilibrium model to carry out the analysis. We find that the efficiency gains that can be obtained by developing countries might not be very large compared to the risks they incur. Developing countries might therefore have good reasons not to embrace “cap and trade” emissions trading.
机译:本文探讨了发展中国家采取有约束力的承诺的未来气候协议各方的成本和收益。这样的承诺将使发展中国家参与排放交易,与目前的清洁发展机制(CDM)相比,交易成本大大降低。因此,我们分析了通过参与有约束力的承诺,参与排放交易所获得的效率收益是否能够抵消经济风险(由于无法知道未来排放的事实)。我们使用动态可计算的一般均衡模型进行分析。我们发现,与它们所带来的风险相比,发展中国家可以获得的效率增益可能不是很大。因此,发展中国家可能有充分的理由不采用“总量控制与贸易”排放交易。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号