首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Doctrine (Maybe), Strategy (No): Will the Air Force Implement a Force Protection Program
【24h】

Doctrine (Maybe), Strategy (No): Will the Air Force Implement a Force Protection Program

机译:学说(可能),战略(否):空军是否会实施部队保护计划

获取原文

摘要

The US Air Force's response to the bombing of Khobar Towers in June 1996 was to consolidate and remove our forces to a more isolated (bare base) location in the Saudi desert. While a seemingly logical step, removing our forces from Saudi population areas means that determined future terrorists could employ weapons against US forces without the worry of collateral damage to Saudi nationals. There are many other questions that need answering about our organizailonal preparedness for a chemical or biological event. For example, in the event of such an attack, is the US civil engineering force trained and equipped for the decontamination of the attacked base and other bases. Does Air Force doctrine include recovery of a base from a chemical attack, or will we evacuate to a new toxic-free area and leave the attacked base and its resources behind. Are our anmen protected from building collapse. These kinds of questions prompt larger issues.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号