...
首页> 外文期刊>Personnel psychology >DOES PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE STRAIN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP? THE EFFECT OF MANAGER BONUS ELIGIBILITY ON NONMANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE TURNOVER
【24h】

DOES PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE STRAIN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP? THE EFFECT OF MANAGER BONUS ELIGIBILITY ON NONMANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE TURNOVER

机译:按绩效支付会拉紧雇佣关系吗?经理奖金资格对非管理员工流失的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We tested the organization-level effects of manager pay-for-performance practices on nonmanagement employee turnover within the context of agency theory and equity theorytwo frameworks commonly applied to understand compensation policy and practice. We also propose an alternative theoretical perspective that predicts that managerial pay-for-performance policies may strain the employment relationship and increase nonmanagement employee turnover, unless there are HR practices that train and incentivize managers to treat employees well. We compare these alternative models to establish how well each framework explains the observed effects. Agency theory and equity theory receive limited empirical support in our lagged panel data set of organizations, whereas broader empirical support is established for the strain effect of manager pay-for-performance on the employment relationship. We discuss the implications of our findings for compensation theory, research, and practice.
机译:我们在通常用于理解薪酬政策和实践的代理理论和权益理论这两个框架的背景下,测试了经理绩效绩效制对非管理型员工流动的组织级影响。我们还提出了另一种理论观点,该观点认为,绩效薪酬管理政策可能会使雇佣关系紧张,并增加非管理人员的离职率,除非有人力资源实践能够培训和激励管理人员善待员工。我们比较这些替代模型,以确定每个框架对观察到的效果的解释程度。代理理论和公平理论在我们的组织滞后面板数据集中获得的经验支持有限,而针对经理绩效报酬对雇佣关系的压力效应建立了更广泛的经验支持。我们讨论了我们的发现对薪酬理论,研究和实践的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号