...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Effect of a probiotic infant formula on infections in child care centers: comparison of two probiotic agents.
【24h】

Effect of a probiotic infant formula on infections in child care centers: comparison of two probiotic agents.

机译:婴幼儿益生菌配方奶粉对儿童保育中心感染的影响:两种益生菌剂的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of 2 different species of probiotics in preventing infections in infants attending child care centers. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted from December 1, 2000, to September 30, 2002, at 14 child care centers in the Beer-Sheva area of Israel in healthy term infants 4 to 10 months old. Infants were assigned randomly to formula supplemented with Bifidobacterium lactis (BB-12), Lactobacillus reuteri (American Type Culture Collection 55730), or no probiotics. Duration of feeding, including follow-up, for each participant was 12 weeks. All infants were fed only the assigned formula and were not breastfed due to parental decision before recruitment to the study. Probiotic or prebiotic food products or supplements were not allowed. Main outcome measures were number of days and number of episodes with fever (>38 degrees C) and number of days and number of episodes with diarrhea or respiratory illness. RESULTS: Participants (n = 201) were similar regarding gestational age, birth weight, gender, and previous breastfeeding. The controls (n = 60), compared with those fed B lactis (n = 73) or L reuteri (n = 68), had significantly more febrile episodes (mean [95% confidence interval]: 0.41 [0.28-0.54] vs 0.27 [0.17-0.37] vs 0.11 [0.04-0.18], respectively). The controls also had more diarrhea episodes (0.31 [0.22-0.40] vs 0.13 [0.05-0.21] vs 0.02 [0.01-0.05], respectively) and episodes of longer duration (0.59 [0.34-0.84] vs 0.37 [0.08-0.66] vs 0.15 [0.12-0.18] days, respectively). The L reuteri group, compared with BB-12 or controls, had a significant decrease of number of days with fever, clinic visits, child care absences, and antibiotic prescriptions. Rate and duration of respiratory illnesses did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Child care infants fed a formula supplemented with L reuteri or B lactis had fewer and shorter episodes of diarrhea, with no effect on respiratory illnesses. These effects were more prominent with L reuteri, which was also the only supplement to improve additional morbidity parameters.
机译:目的:研究两种不同种类的益生菌对预防在儿童保育中心就诊的婴儿的感染的作用。方法:2000年12月1日至2002年9月30日,在以色列比尔谢瓦地区的14个儿童保育中心进行了一项双盲,安慰剂对照的随机试验,研究对象为4至10个月大的健康足月婴儿。将婴儿随机分配至补充有乳酸双歧杆菌(BB-12),罗伊氏乳杆菌(美国典型培养物保藏中心55730)或不含益生菌的配方食品。每个参与者的进食时间(包括随访)为12周。所有婴儿仅接受指定的配方食品喂养,并且在招募至研究之前由于父母的决定未进行母乳喂养。不允许使用益生菌或益生元食品或补品。主要结局指标为发烧(> 38摄氏度)的天数和发作次数以及腹泻或呼吸道疾病的天数和发作次数。结果:参与者(n = 201)在胎龄,出生体重,性别和以前的母乳喂养方面相似。对照组(n = 60),与喂食乳杆菌B(n = 73)或罗伊氏乳杆菌(n = 68)的对照组相比,发热事件明显多(平均[95%置信区间]:0.41 [0.28-0.54] vs 0.27)分别为[0.17-0.37]和0.11 [0.04-0.18]。对照组的腹泻发作也更多(分别为0.31 [0.22-0.40] vs 0.13 [0.05-0.21] vs 0.02 [0.01-0.05]),持续时间更长(0.59 [0.34-0.84] vs 0.37 [0.08-0.66])分别为0.15 [0.12-0.18]天)。罗伊氏乳杆菌组与BB-12或对照组相比,发烧,门诊就诊,缺少儿童护理和抗生素处方的天数显着减少。两组之间呼吸系统疾病的发生率和持续时间没有显着差异。结论:喂食补充路氏乳杆菌或乳杆菌B的配方奶粉的幼儿婴儿腹泻的发作越来越少,对呼吸系统疾病没有影响。罗伊氏乳杆菌更显着这些效果,罗伊氏乳杆菌也是改善其他发病率参数的唯一补充剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号