首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Pulmonology >The combination of PCR and serology increases the diagnosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization/infection in cystic fibrosis.
【24h】

The combination of PCR and serology increases the diagnosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization/infection in cystic fibrosis.

机译:PCR和血清学的结合提高了对铜绿假单胞菌在囊性纤维化中定植/感染的诊断。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization/infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) using microbiological culturing methods may be difficult. Serology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may be useful techniques for early detection of P. aeruginosa in children with CF. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis comparing results obtained by three different methods for P. aeruginosa identification was performed in 87 CF patients with a mean age of 9.7 years. Microbiological culturing and PCR targeting the algD GDP mannose dehydrogenase gene of P. aeruginosa were performed in sputum or oropharyngeal swabs samples, and serum antibodies against three P. aeruginosa antigens (elastase, alkaline protease, and exotoxin A) were assessed once. RESULTS: It was possible to isolate P. aeruginosa by culture in samples from 42 patients (48.2%), while PCR was positive in 53 (60.9%) patients. Serology was positive in 38 patients (43.6%), with a higher positivity for elastase (37.9%), followed byalkaline protease (29.9%) and exotoxin A (19.5%). The difference among the three isolated methods was not statistically significant. The combination of PCR + serology was significantly superior to single methods, to PCR + culture and also to culture + serology. CONCLUSIONS: PCR identified a higher number of patients with P. aeruginosa than serology and conventional culture, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Any of the combination methods that included PCR resulted in significantly statistical differences in relation to isolated microbiological or serology methods, but not to the PCR method alone, suggesting that PCR may be the main additive method for P. aeruginosa identification.
机译:背景:使用微生物培养方法早期诊断囊性纤维化(CF)患者的铜绿假单胞菌定植/感染可能很困难。血清学和聚合酶链反应(PCR)可能是早期检测CF儿童铜绿假单胞菌的有用技术。方法:对87例平均年龄为9.7岁的CF患者进行横断面分析,比较通过三种不同方法鉴定铜绿假单胞菌的结果。在痰或口咽拭子样品中进行了针对铜绿假单胞菌的algD GDP甘露糖脱氢酶基因的微生物培养和PCR,并且一次评估了针对三种铜绿假单胞菌抗原(弹性蛋白酶,碱性蛋白酶和外毒素A)的血清抗体。结果:有可能通过培养从42例患者中分离出铜绿假单胞菌(48.2%),而PCR阳性的有53例(60.9%)。血清学阳性的38例患者(43.6%),对弹性蛋白酶的阳性率更高(37.9%),其次是碱性蛋白酶(29.9%)和外毒素A(19.5%)。三种隔离方法之间的差异无统计学意义。 PCR +血清学的组合明显优于单一方法,PCR +培养以及文化+血清学。结论:PCR鉴定出的铜绿假单胞菌患者比血清学和常规培养的患者多,但差异没有统计学意义。包括PCR在内的任何组合方法均导致与分离的微生物学或血清学方法相比有显着的统计学差异,但与单独的PCR方法无关,这表明PCR可能是铜绿假单胞菌鉴定的主要附加方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号