首页> 外文期刊>Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer >The use of olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy
【24h】

The use of olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy

机译:奥氮平与甲氧氯普胺在接受高促发性化疗的患者中突破性化疗所致恶心和呕吐的治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: Olanzapine has been shown to be a safe and effective agent for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Olanzapine may also be an effective rescue medication for patients who develop breakthrough CINV despite having received guideline-directed CINV prophylaxis. Methods: A double-blind, randomized phase III trial was performed for the treatment of breakthrough CINV in chemotherapy-naive patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (cisplatin, ≥ 70 mg/m2 or doxorubicin, ≥ 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide, ≥ 600 mg/m2), comparing olanzapine to metoclopramide. Patients who developed breakthrough emesis or nausea despite prophylactic dexamethasone (12 mg IV), palonosetron (0.25 mg IV), and fosaprepitant (150 mg IV) pre-chemotherapy and dexamethasone (8 mg p.o. daily, days 2-4) post-chemotherapy were randomized to receive olanzapine, 10 mg orally daily for 3 days or metoclopramide, 10 mg orally TID for 3 days. Patients were monitored for emesis and nausea for 72 h after taking olanzapine or metoclopramide. Two hundred seventy-six patients (median age 62 years, range 38-79; 43 % women; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS 0,1) consented to the protocol. One hundred twelve patients developed breakthrough CINV and 108 were evaluable. Results: During the 72-h observation period, 39 out of 56 (70 %) patients receiving olanzapine had no emesis compared to 16 out of 52 (31 %) patients with no emesis for patients receiving metoclopramide (p 0.01). Patients without nausea (0, scale 0-10, M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory) during the 72-h observation period were those who took olanzapine, 68 % (38 of 56), and metoclopramide, 23 % (12 of 52) (p 0.01). There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Conclusions: Olanzapine was significantly better than metoclopramide in the control of breakthrough emesis and nausea in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
机译:目的:奥氮平已被证明是预防化学疗法引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的安全有效的药物。奥氮平对于接受突破性CINV预防治疗但仍发展为突破性CINV的患者也可能是一种有效的急救药物。方法:一项双盲,随机III期试验针对未接受过高促发化疗(顺铂≥70 mg / m2或阿霉素,≥50 mg / m2和环磷酰胺,≥600 mg)的初治化疗的初治患者进行了突破性CINV的治疗。 / m2),比较奥氮平与甲氧氯普胺。尽管在化疗前进行了地塞米松预防性预防(预防性地塞米松(12 mg IV),帕洛诺司琼(0.25 mg IV)和福沙泼坦(150 mg IV))和化疗后地塞米松(每天8 mg口服,每天2-4天)仍出现突破性呕吐或恶心。随机接受奥氮平(口服每天10毫克,持续3天)或甲氧氯普胺(10毫克,口服TID,持续3天)。服用奥氮平或胃复安后72小时监测患者的呕吐和恶心。 276名患者(中位年龄62岁,范围38-79;女性43%;东部合作肿瘤小组(ECOG)PS 0,1)同意该方案。 112名患者出现了突破性的CINV,108例可评估。结果:在72小时观察期内,接受奥氮平治疗的56名患者中有39名(70%)没有呕吐,而接受甲氧氯普胺治疗的52名患者中有16名(31%)没有呕吐(p <0.01)。在72小时观察期内无恶心的患者(0,等级0-10,MD安德森症状量表)是服用奥氮平68%(56中的38)和服用甲氧氯普胺23%(52中的12)的患者(p < 0.01)。没有3级或4级毒性。结论:在接受高呕吐化疗的患者中,奥氮平在控制突破性呕吐和恶心方面明显优于甲氧氯普胺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号