...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Analysis of verbal communication during teaching in the operating room and the potentials for surgical training.
【24h】

Analysis of verbal communication during teaching in the operating room and the potentials for surgical training.

机译:分析在手术室中进行教学时的言语交流以及进行外科手术训练的可能性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Verbal communication in the operating room during surgical procedures affects team performance, reflects individual skills, and is related to the complexity of the operation process. During the procedural training of surgeons (residents), feedback and guidance is given through verbal communication. A classification method based on structural analysis of the contents was developed to analyze verbal communication. This study aimed to evaluate whether a classification method for the contents of verbal communication in the operating room could provide insight into the teaching processes. METHODS: Eight laparoscopic cholecystectomies were videotaped. Two entire cholecystectomies and the dissection phase of six additional procedures were analyzed by categorization of the communication in terms of type (4 categories: commanding, explaining, questioning, and miscellaneous) and content (9 categories: operation method, location, direction, instrument handling, visualization, anatomy and pathology, general, private, undefinable). The operation was divided into six phases: start, dissection, clipping, separating, control, closing. RESULTS: Classification of the communication during two entire procedures showed that each phase of the operation was dominated by different kinds of communication. A high percentage of explaining anatomy and pathology was found throughout the whole procedure except for the control and closing phases. In the dissection phases, 60% of verbal communication concerned explaining. These explaining communication events were divided as follows: 27% operation method, 19% anatomy and pathology, 25% location (positioning of the instrument-tissue interaction), 15% direction (direction of tissue manipulation), 11% instrument handling, and 3% other nonclassified instructions. CONCLUSION: The proposed classification method is feasible for analyzing verbal communication during surgical procedures. Communication content objectively reflects the interaction between surgeon and resident. This information can potentially be used to specify training needs, and may contribute to the evaluation of different training methods.
机译:背景:在外科手术过程中,手术室中的口头交流会影响团队绩效,反映出个人技能,并且与手术过程的复杂性有关。在对外科医生(住院医师)进行程序培训期间,通过口头交流提供反馈和指导。提出了一种基于内容结构分析的分类方法来分析言语交际。这项研究旨在评估手术室口头交流内容的分类方法是否可以提供对教学过程的深入了解。方法:对八个腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行了录像。通过按类型(指挥,解释,提问和其他四个类别)和内容(9个类别:操作方法,位置,方向,器械操作)对通信进行分类,分析了两个完整的胆囊切除术和六个附加程序的解剖阶段,可视化,解剖学和病理学,一般,私人,无法定义)。该操作分为六个阶段:开始,解剖,剪裁,分离,控制,关闭。结果:在两个完整过程中对通信进行分类显示,操作的每个阶段均由不同类型的通信控制。在整个过程中,除了控制和闭合阶段外,都获得了很高比例的解剖学和病理学解释。在解剖阶段,有60%的口头交流与解释有关。这些解释性的交流事件分为:27%的手术方法,19%的解剖学和病理学,25%的位置(器械与组织的相互作用的位置),15%的方向(组织操纵的方向),11%的器械操作和3 %其他未分类说明。结论:提出的分类方法对于分析手术过程中的言语交流是可行的。交流内容客观地反映了外科医生与住院医师之间的互动。该信息可能会用于指定培训需求,并且可能有助于评估不同的培训方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号