首页> 外文期刊>Surgical innovation >Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for portal hypertension: A systematic review of comparative studies
【24h】

Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for portal hypertension: A systematic review of comparative studies

机译:腹腔镜与开放式脾切除术治疗门静脉高压症:比较研究的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Laparoscopic splenectomy has become the gold-standard procedure for normal to moderately enlarged spleens. However, the safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with portal hypertension remains controversial. We carried out this systematic review to identify the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy in treating portal hypertension. Data sources. A systematic search for comparative studies that compared laparoscopic splenectomy with open splenectomy for portal hypertension was carried out. Studies were independently reviewed for quality, inclusion and exclusion criteria, demographic characteristics, and perioperative outcomes. Conclusion. Although laparoscopic splenectomy is associated with longer operating time, it offers advantages over the open procedure in terms of less blood loss, lower operative complications, earlier resumption of oral intake, and shorter posthospital stay. Therefore, laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe and feasible intervention for portal hypertension.
机译:背景。腹腔镜脾切除术已成为正常至中度脾肿的金标准手术。然而,腹腔镜脾切除术对门静脉高压症患者的安全性仍存在争议。我们进行了系统的审查,以确定腹腔镜脾切除术治疗门静脉高压症的可行性和安全性。数据源。进行了系统比较研究,以比较腹腔镜脾切除术与开腹脾切除术治疗门静脉高压症的比较。对研究进行了质量,纳入和排除标准,人口统计学特征和围手术期结局的独立审查。结论。尽管腹腔镜脾切除术需要更长的手术时间,但是与开放手术相比,它在减少失血量,降低手术并发症,更早恢复口腔摄入以及缩短住院时间方面具有优势。因此,腹腔镜脾切除术是门脉高压症的一种安全可行的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号