...
首页> 外文期刊>Structure and Infrastructure Engineering >Analysing dispute mediation cases of infrastructure projects through project life cycle
【24h】

Analysing dispute mediation cases of infrastructure projects through project life cycle

机译:通过项目生命周期分析基础设施项目的争议调解案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Regardless of their pattern, construction disputes create additional costs in terms of money and time for both owner and contractor. The Taiwanese Government promulgated the Government Procurement Act (GPA) on 27 May 1998. This Act established a Dispute Mediation System (DMS) to mediate construction disputes involving contractors and the administration and attempted to reduce associated litigation. The DMS resembles the Dispute Review Board (DRB) that was established in the mid 1970s. The DRB is set up at the start of a construction project, and meets regularly at the job site to resolve any disputes as they occur. However, the DMS system does not become active in mediating construction disputes until a specific request is submitted by the contractor. The present study not only introduces this DMS, but also analyses previous dispute mediation cases involving Taiwanese infrastructure projects including dispute patterns, succinct case explanations, and mediation suggestions.
机译:无论采用哪种形式,施工纠纷都会给业主和承包商带来额外的金钱和时间成本。台湾政府于1998年5月27日颁布了《政府采购法》(GPA)。该法建立了争议调解系统(DMS),以调解涉及承包商和行政部门的建筑纠纷,并试图减少相关诉讼。 DMS与1970年代中期成立的争议审查委员会(DRB)类似。 DRB是在建筑项目开始时设立的,并在工作现场定期开会以解决所有纠纷。但是,在承包商提出具体要求之前,DMS系统不会主动调解建筑纠纷。本研究不仅介绍了该DMS,还分析了以前涉及台湾基础设施项目的争议调解案例,包括争议模式,简洁的案例说明和调解建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号