首页> 外文期刊>Statistical Journal of the IAOS: Journal of the International Association for Official Statistics >An empirical examination of the relationship between nonresponse rate and nonresponse bias
【24h】

An empirical examination of the relationship between nonresponse rate and nonresponse bias

机译:对无应答率和无应答偏差之间关系的实证检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The dramatic decline in survey response rates over the past three decades raises significant concerns about the possibility of bias in survey results. Current theory emphasizes that it is the relationship between response propensity and variables of interest that determines the extent of the bias, and that a low response rate in itself does not necessarily imply a high level of bias. This assertion is supported by a number of studies which have shown that response rate alone is a fairly poor predictor of nonresponse bias. However, most of these studies suffer from methodological features that in some way compromise their attempts to isolate the relationship between response rate and bias. This paper describes the results of a pair of studies which allow for a near-ideal examination of this relationship. The results support the conclusions of prior research, showing that even achieved samples with response rates as low as 10 percent may produce highly accurate estimates in certain cases.
机译:在过去的三十年中,调查答复率的急剧下降引起了人们对调查结果可能产生偏见的极大关注。当前的理论强调,响应倾向与关注变量之间的关系决定了偏差的程度,而较低的响应率本身并不一定意味着较高的偏差水平。许多研究都支持这一观点,这些研究表明,仅响应率是无响应偏差的相当差的预测指标。但是,这些研究大多数都具有方法论特征,这些方法论在某种程度上损害了他们试图隔离响应率和偏倚之间关系的尝试。本文描述了两项研究的结果,这些研究允许对此关系进行近乎理想的检验。结果支持了先前研究的结论,表明即使在某些情况下,即使获得的样本响应率低至10%,也可能产生高度准确的估计值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号