...
首页> 外文期刊>Southern Medical Journal >A comparison of polyethylene glycol laxative and placebo for relief of constipation from constipating medications.
【24h】

A comparison of polyethylene glycol laxative and placebo for relief of constipation from constipating medications.

机译:聚乙二醇泻药和安慰剂用于缓解便秘药物引起便秘的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Medications often cause constipation and little data are available concerning treatment interventions. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 laxative (MiraLax) for relief of constipation from medicines associated with symptoms of constipation. METHODS: Study subjects were enrolled who met defined criteria for chronic constipation and were also taking medications that were associated with a reported side effect incidence of more than 3% constipation. Subjects were randomized into a double-blind, parallel, multicenter study where they received 17 g per day of PEG laxative or placebo for 28 days. The primary efficacy variable, "Treatment Success," was defined as relief of ROME II criteria for constipation over the last 7 days of the treatment period. Various secondary measures were also assessed. Daily bowel movement experience, patient perception of efficacy, and safety information were recorded in a diary. Laboratory testing was performed at baseline and at end of study for hematology and blood chemistry, including BUN, calcium, electrolytes, and TSH. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled at 4 study centers. Successful treatment according to the primary efficacy variable was seen in 78.3% of PEG and 39.1% of placebo subjects (P < 0.001). Similar results were observed in a subgroup of 28 elderly subjects. Secondary measures of number of bowel movements, complete bowel movements, satisfactory bowel movements, straining at stool and stool consistency also showed statistically significant results in favor of PEG compared with placebo (P < or = 0.01) after the first week of treatment. There were no differences inpatient reported scores for gas, cramping, or bloating between PEG and placebo. No significant differences in laboratory findings or adverse events, including the gastrointestinal category, were observed. Diarrhea and flatulence occurred more frequently with PEG treatment, although they were not individually statistically different from placebo. Similar results were observed when these symptoms were analyzed for differences due to gender, race, or age. CONCLUSIONS: PEG laxative is safe and effective for use in treating constipation in patients taking constipating medications.
机译:目的:药物经常引起便秘,关于治疗干预措施的数据很少。这项研究旨在评估聚乙二醇(PEG)3350泻药(MiraLax)从与便秘症状相关的药物中缓解便秘的安全性和有效性。方法:招募符合既定标准的慢性便秘标准的受试者,并服用与据报道副作用超过3%便秘的药物有关的方法。将受试者随机分为双盲,平行,多中心研究,在其中他们每天接受17克PEG泻药或安慰剂治疗28天。主要功效变量“治疗成功”定义为在治疗期的最后7天中缓解ROME II便秘标准。还评估了各种辅助措施。日记中记录了每天的排便经历,患者对疗效的认识以及安全性信息。在基线和研究结束时对血液学和血液化学(包括BUN,钙,电解质和TSH)进行实验室测试。结果:4个研究中心招募了100名患者。根据主要疗效变量,成功的治疗在78.3%的PEG和39.1%的安慰剂受试者中观察到(P <0.001)。在28个老年受试者的亚组中观察到了类似的结果。在治疗的第一周后,次要测量排便次数,完全排便,令人满意的排便,拉紧大便和大便稠度也显示出统计学上显着的有利于PEG的结果,优于安慰剂(P <或= 0.01)。 PEG和安慰剂之间患者报告的气体,痉挛或腹胀评分没有差异。没有发现实验室检查结果或不良事件(包括胃肠道类别)有明显差异。腹泻和肠胃气胀在PEG治疗中更为常见,尽管与安慰剂在统计学上没有分别。分析这些症状的性别,种族或年龄差异后,观察到相似的结果。结论:PEG泻药可安全有效地用于治疗便秘患者的便秘。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号