...
首页> 外文期刊>Seizure: the journal of the British Epilepsy Association >Cross-reactivity of skin rashes with current antiepileptic drugs in Chinese population.
【24h】

Cross-reactivity of skin rashes with current antiepileptic drugs in Chinese population.

机译:皮疹与当前抗癫痫药在中国人群中的交叉反应性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Due to less experience with the cross-reactivity of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in Chinese population, we surveyed the rates of cross- reactivity of rash among commonly used AEDs in Chinese patients with epilepsy, particularly between the traditional and the new compounds. METHODS: We have retrospectively reviewed the medical records concerning all antiepileptic drug treatment in consecutive Chinese patients with epilepsy in our center. The incidence of AED-related rash was determined in 3793 outpatients, taking at least one of the AEDs-carbamazepine (CBZ), valproic acid (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), clonazepam (CZP), oxcarbazepine (OXC), lamotrigine (LTG), gabapentin (GBP), topiramate (TPM), levetiracetam (LEV) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). We have performed telephone interviews among all patients with AEDs-related rash. We described the clinical characteristics of the 18 patients with cross-reactivity involving the AEDs, and the cross- reactivity pattern for CBZ, PHT, OXC, and LTG. RESULTS: A total of 3.61% (137/3793) of patients experienced a skin rash to at least one AEDs, of these patients, 73 (53.28%) were female and 64 were males (46.72%). While 18 patients had a rash to two or more AEDs. Of patients who had a rash to CBZ and were also prescribed PHT (n = 17), 52.9% had a rash to PHT (abbreviated as CBZ --> PHT: 52.9%); of patients who had a rash to PHT and were also prescribed CBZ (n = 13), rate of rash was 69.2% (i.e., PHT --> CBZ: 69.2%). Other results: CBZ --> LTG: 25% (n = 16); LTG --> CBZ: 44.4% (n = 9); CBZ--> OXC: 40% (n = 10); OXC --> CBZ: 66.7% (n = 6); LTG --> PHT: 20% (n = 5); PHT --> LTG: 16.7% (n = 6); OXC --> LTG: 25% (n=4); LTG --> OXC: 33.3% (n = 3); OXC --> PHT: 25% (n = 4); PHT --> OXC: 16.7% (n = 6). There was a highly significant mutual risk for cross- reactivity for CBZ and PHT, and OXC, and LTG (p<0.001), mutual risk reached statistical significance for LTG and CBZ (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Cross-reactivity rates between certain AEDs are high, especially when involving carbamazepine and phenytoin. There were also too few patients with rash to reach definitely conclusions about possible cross-reactivity. Larger numbers of patients would be needed to assess this and the mechanism. Caution should be exercised when prescribing certain AEDs (especially CBZ and PHT, but also OXC, and LTG).
机译:目的:由于在中国人群中抗癫痫药物(AED)的交叉反应性经验较少,我们调查了中国癫痫患者常用AED之间皮疹的交叉反应率,尤其是传统化合物与新化合物之间的皮疹交叉反应率。方法:我们回顾性回顾了我们中心对连续的中国癫痫患者进行所有抗癫痫药物治疗的病历。在3793名门诊患者中确定了AED相关皮疹的发生率,他们服用了AED-卡马西平(CBZ),丙戊酸(VPA),苯妥英钠(PHT),苯巴比妥(PB),氯硝西am(CZP),奥卡西平(OXC)中的至少一种),拉莫三嗪(LTG),加巴喷丁(GBP),托吡酯(TPM),左乙拉西坦(LEV)和中药(TCM)。我们对所有与AED相关的皮疹患者进行了电话采访。我们描述了18例涉及AED的交叉反应性患者的临床特征,以及CBZ,PHT,OXC和LTG的交叉反应性模式。结果:共有3.61%(137/3793)的患者出现皮疹,至少出现一种AED,其中73例(53.28%)为女性,64例为男性(46.72%)。 18例患者出现两个或多个AED皮疹。在患有CBZ皮疹并且还开了PHT的患者中(n = 17),有52.9%的患者患有PHT皮疹(缩写为CBZ-> PHT:52.9%);在患有PHT皮疹并且还开具CBZ的患者中(n = 13),皮疹发生率为69.2%(即PHT-> CBZ:69.2%)。其他结果:CBZ-> LTG:25%(n = 16); LTG-> CBZ:44.4%(n = 9); CBZ-> OXC:40%(n = 10); OXC-> CBZ:66.7%(n = 6); LTG-> PHT:20%(n = 5); PHT-> LTG:16.7%(n = 6); OXC-> LTG:25%(n = 4); LTG-> OXC:33.3%(n = 3); OXC-> PHT:25%(n = 4); PHT-> OXC:16.7%(n = 6)。 CBZ和PHT,OXC和LTG的交叉反应性存在极高的共同风险(p <0.001),LTG和CBZ的相互反应性具有统计学意义(p = 0.01)。结论:某些AED之间的交叉反应率很高,尤其是涉及卡马西平和苯妥英钠时。皮疹患者也很少,无法就可能的交叉反应得出明确的结论。需要更多的患者来评估这种情况和机制。处方某些AED(尤其是CBZ和PHT,还包括OXC和LTG)时应格外小心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号