首页> 外文期刊>Scottish medical journal >Patient preferences for single rooms or shared accommodation in a district general hospital.
【24h】

Patient preferences for single rooms or shared accommodation in a district general hospital.

机译:患者对地区综合医院中单人间或合住的偏爱。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patients who have used a Scottish district general hospital would prefer single or shared accommodation on a future admission. METHODS: We surveyed 80 in-patients in January 2008 in order to obtain 20 medical and 20 surgical patients in single rooms and the same number in shared accommodation. Each patient received a seven point questionnaire that had been validated in another centre. RESULTS: Forty four men and 36 women, median 64 years, who had been in hospital for a median of 4.5 days (range 1 to 53 days) participated in the survey. Seventy per cent of patients in shared and 40% of patients in single rooms said they would prefer shared accommodation during a future hospital admission. Those expressing a preference for shared accommodation were older (median age 68 versus 58 years) and had been in hospital for longer (median 5.5 versus 3.5 days) than those who said they would prefer a single room. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that the desire for company among older people who have to spend a week or more in hospital is driving the responses we obtained. Our findings do not support claims that the argument in favour of 100% single rooms is 'overwhelming'.
机译:目的:确定使用过苏格兰地区综合医院的患者在以后的入院时是偏爱单人房还是共享房。方法:我们于2008年1月对80名住院患者进行了调查,目的是在单人房中获得20名医疗和20名外科病人,并在同一房间中获得相同数量的医疗和手术患者。每位患者均收到一份已在另一中心进行验证的七点问卷。结果:44名男性和36名女性,中位数64岁,住院时间中位数为4.5天(1至53天),参加了调查。共有房间的患者中有70%,单人间的患者中有40%表示,在以后的住院期间,他们更喜欢共享的住所。与那些愿意单人住所的人相比,那些表示愿意选择共同住所的人年龄更大(中位年龄为68岁对58岁),住院时间更长(中位年龄为5.5天对3.5天)。结论:可能需要在医院度过一个星期或更长时间的老年人中对陪伴的渴望正在推动我们获得的回应。我们的发现不支持主张100%单人房的论点“势不可挡”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号