首页> 外文期刊>Scottish medical journal >Walk or run? is high-intensity exercise more effective than moderate-intensity exercise at reducing cardiovascular risk?
【24h】

Walk or run? is high-intensity exercise more effective than moderate-intensity exercise at reducing cardiovascular risk?

机译:走路还是跑步?高强度运动比中强度运动在降低心血管风险方面是否有效?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The benefits of exercise in the prevention of cardiovascular disease are irrefutable. However, the optimum 'dose' of exercise in order to derive the maximum cardiovascular benefit is not certain. Current national and international guidelines advocate the benefits of moderate-intensity exercise. The relative benefits of vigorous versus moderate-intensity exercise have been studied in large epidemiological studies, addressing coronary heart disease and mortality, as well as smaller randomized clinical trials which assessed effects on cardio- vascular risk factors. There is evidence that exercise intensity, rather than duration or frequency, is the most important variable in determining cardioprotection. Applying this evidence into practice must take into account the impact of baseline fitness, compliance and the independent risk associated with a sedentary lifestyle. This review aims to evaluate the role of exercise intensity in the reduction of cardiovascular risk, and answer the question: should you be advising your patients to walk or run?
机译:运动对预防心血管疾病的益处是无可辩驳的。然而,为了获得最大的心血管益处,运动的最佳“剂量”尚不确定。当前的国家和国际准则主张中等强度运动的好处。在大型流行病学研究中,研究了剧烈运动与中等强度运动的相对益处,这些研究针对冠心病和死亡率,以及较小的随机临床试验,该试验评估了对心血管危险因素的影响。有证据表明,运动强度而不是持续时间或频率是决定心脏保护作用的最重要变量。在实践中应用该证据必须考虑基线适应性,依从性和久坐不动生活方式带来的独立风险的影响。这篇综述旨在评估运动强度在降低心血管风险中的作用,并回答以下问题:您是否应该建议患者走路或跑步?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号