...
首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >A risk perspective suitable for resilience engineering
【24h】

A risk perspective suitable for resilience engineering

机译:适用于弹性工程的风险观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In recent years, resilience engineering has been given considerable attention among safety researchers and analysts. The area represents a new way of thinking about safety. Whereas conventional risk management approaches are based on hindsight knowledge, failure reporting and risk assessments calculating historical data-based probabilities, resilience engineering looks for ways to enhance the ability of organisations to be resilient in the sense that they recognise, adapt to and absorb variations, changes, disturbances, disruptions and surprises. The implications of this shift in thinking are many. We focus in this paper on the understanding of the risk concept and how risk can be assessed and treated. The traditional ways of looking at risk are not suitable for use in resilience engineering, but other risk perspectives exist. A main purpose of this paper is to draw attention to such perspectives, in particular one category of perspectives where probability is replaced by uncertainty in the definition of risk. We argue that the basic ideas of resilience engineering can be supported by such risk perspectives.
机译:近年来,安全性研究人员和分析人员对弹性工程学给予了极大的关注。该区域代表了一种新的安全思考方式。传统的风险管理方法是基于事后知识,失败报告和风险评估来计算基于历史数据的概率,而弹性工程则寻求增强组织在识别,适应和吸收变化方面的弹性的能力,变化,干扰,破坏和惊喜。这种思维转变的含义很多。在本文中,我们着重于对风险概念的理解以及如何评估和处理风险。传统的风险评估方法不适合在弹性工程中使用,但存在其他风险观点。本文的主要目的是引起人们对此类观点的关注,尤其是一类观点,其中风险定义中的不确定性代替了概率。我们认为,这种风险观点可以支持弹性工程的基本思想。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号