首页> 外文期刊>Optik: Zeitschrift fur Licht- und Elektronenoptik: = Journal for Light-and Electronoptic >Comparison of classifiers for lip reading with CUAVE and TULIPS database
【24h】

Comparison of classifiers for lip reading with CUAVE and TULIPS database

机译:唇读分类器与CUAVE和TULIPS数据库的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Automatic lip reading is a technique of understanding the uttered speech by visually interpreting the lip movement of the speaker. The two major parts, which play crucial role in lip reading system, are feature extraction followed by the classifier. For automatic lip reading, there are many competing methods published by researchers for feature extraction and classifiers. In this paper, we compare some of these leading methods. We have compared Support Vector Machine (SVM), Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), K-Nearest Neighborhood (KNN), Random Forest Method (RFM) and Naive Bayes (NB) classifiers, on the basis of recognition performance and training time. Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) are studied to extract feature vectors. The CUAVE and Tulips database are used for experimentation and comparison. It is observed that SVM outperforms the rest for CUAVE database. Training time of SVM is also less than others. (C) 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译:自动唇读是通过视觉上解释扬声器的唇部运动来理解发声的技术。在唇读系统中起关键作用的两个主要部分是特征提取,然后是分类器。对于自动唇读,研究人员发布了许多竞争性方法来进行特征提取和分类。在本文中,我们比较了其中的一些领先方法。我们根据识别性能和训练时间,对支持向量机(SVM),反向传播神经网络(BPNN),K最近邻(KNN),随机森林方法(RFM)和朴素贝叶斯(NB)分类器进行了比较。研究了离散余弦变换(DCT)和离散小波变换(DWT)来提取特征向量。 CUAVE和Tulips数据库用于实验和比较。可以看出,对于CUAVE数据库,SVM的性能优于其余的。 SVM的培训时间也比其他时间少。 (C)2015 Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号