首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Comparison between optical coherence tomography and fundus fluorescein angiography for the detection of cystoid macular edema in patients with uveitis.
【24h】

Comparison between optical coherence tomography and fundus fluorescein angiography for the detection of cystoid macular edema in patients with uveitis.

机译:光学相干断层扫描和眼底荧光血管造影在葡萄膜炎患者中检测黄斑囊样水肿的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) with fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) for the detection of cystoid macular edema (CME) in patients with uveitis. DESIGN: Prospective comparative observational series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-one eyes of 58 patients with uveitis of varied causes (seven patients were studied twice). TESTING: Patients with suspected CME underwent OCT scanning followed by FFA at the same visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detection and distribution of macular edema. RESULTS: One hundred eight eyes had similar results on both OCT and FFA in that 67 eyes had CME and 41 eyes had no CME. In 10 eyes subretinal fluid was detected on OCT but not FFA. Five of these eyes had CME on FFA but not OCT. Three other eyes had CME that was detected by FFA but not by OCT. Compared with FFA, the OCT sensitivity for detecting CME was 96% (including the eyes with subretinal fluid), and the OCT specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: OCT is as effective at detecting CME as is FFA but is superior in demonstrating axial distribution of fluid.
机译:目的:比较光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和眼底荧光血管造影(FFA)在葡萄膜炎患者中检测囊样黄斑水肿(CME)的能力。设计:前瞻性比较观察系列。参与者:58例因各种原因引起的葡萄膜炎的一百一十二只眼(对七名患者进行了两次研究)。测试:怀疑CME的患者在同一次就诊时接受了OCT扫描,然后进行了FFA扫描。主要观察指标:黄斑水肿的检测和分布。结果:108只眼的OCT和FFA结果相似,其中67只眼为CME,而41只眼无CME。在10只眼中,在OCT上检测到视网膜下液,但未检测到FFA。这些眼睛中有五只在FFA上有CME,但没有OCT。另外三只眼的CME被FFA检测到,但未被OCT检测到。与FFA相比,OCT检测CME的灵敏度为96%(包括视网膜下液的眼睛),OCT特异性为100%。结论:OCT在检测CME方面与FFA一样有效,但在证明流体的轴向分布方面表现优异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号