首页> 外文期刊>Cereal Foods World >Comparison of Different Methods for Rice Bran Stabilization and Their Impact on Oil Extraction and Nutrient Destruction
【24h】

Comparison of Different Methods for Rice Bran Stabilization and Their Impact on Oil Extraction and Nutrient Destruction

机译:不同米糠稳定方法的比较及其对油脂提取和营养破坏的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The impact of four thermal processing methods on rice bran stabilization, oil extraction, and nutrient destruction was compared. All of the processing equipments, except the pellet mill, had a positive effect on rice bran stabilization. Maximum oil (204 g/kg) was extracted from samples processed using the pellet cooker, followed by the extruder (202 g/kg), while samples processed by the pellet mill gave the least (172 g/kg) oil yield. It was further observed that oil in samples with lower bulk densities and high fines tended to be easily extracted with few exceptions. The total energy input for the extruder (481 kJ) and expander cookers (412 kJ) was significantly higher than that of the pellet cooker (218 kJ) and pellet mill (167 kJ). This high-energy input causes the destruction of vitamin E, as was observed in the samples processed by extruder and expander cookers.
机译:比较了四种热处理方法对米糠稳定,油浸和营养破坏的影响。除制粒机外,所有加工设备对米糠稳定化都有积极作用。从使用颗粒蒸煮器处理的样品中提取最大油(204 g / kg),然后从挤出机(202 g / kg)提取,而通过颗粒磨机处理的样品的油收率最低(172 g / kg)。进一步观察到,具有低堆积密度和高细度的样品中的油倾向于容易地提取,几乎没有例外。挤出机(481 kJ)和膨胀机蒸锅(412 kJ)的总能量输入显着高于颗粒料蒸锅(218 kJ)和颗粒机的总能量(167 kJ)。如在挤出机和膨胀机炊具处理的样品中所观察到的那样,这种高能量输入会破坏维生素E。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号