首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Administrative Law: Scope of Judicial Review
【24h】

Administrative Law: Scope of Judicial Review

机译:行政法:司法审查范围

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Chief of the Division issues a permit for a longwall mining operation. The operation is an extension of an existing mine. The permit applicant is the owner of the coal estate. Simpson is the surface owner and seeks an administrative appeal of the Chief's decision. The Reclamation Commission dismisses the appeal and judicial review is sought. Held: affirmed. Judicial review of a Commission decision is deferential under the arbitrary, capricious, or abuse of discretion standard. The court rejects Simpson's claim that the Commission should consider the impact of its permit decision on potential oil and/or natural gas operations. Apparently the coal estate owner does not own the other mineral rights. The court notes mat the Commission does not have the authority to resolve property and/or title disputes. The Chief properly considered the statutory and regulatory requirements for surface reclamation when it issued the permit. The speculative claim that the reclamation requirements might deleteriously impact future surface and/or mineral development does not make the permit decision arbitrary or capricious.
机译:该司司长签发长壁开采作业许可证。该作业是现有矿山的延伸。许可证申请人是煤矿的所有者。辛普森(Simpson)是地面所有人,并要求行政长官的决定提起行政上诉。填海委员会驳回上诉,并寻求司法审查。举行:肯定。在任意,反复无常或滥用酌处权标准的情况下,对委员会决定的司法审查是有根据的。法院驳回了辛普森关于委员会应考虑其许可决定对潜在石油和/或天然气运营的影响的主张。显然,煤炭所有者不拥有其他采矿权。法院指出,委员会无权解决财产和/或所有权纠纷。酋长签发许可证时适当考虑了表面开垦的法律和法规要求。关于开垦要求可能对将来的地表和/或矿产发展造成不利影响的投机性主张,并未使许可决定具有任意性或反复无常。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号