...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and endometrial ablation in heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
【24h】

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and endometrial ablation in heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机译:左炔诺孕酮释放子宫内膜系统和子宫内膜消融治疗严重月经出血:系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and endometrial ablation in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding. DATA SOURCES: Medline and EMBASE were searched online using Ovid up to January 2009, as well as the reference lists of published articles, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the levonorgestrel intrauterine system with endometrial ablation in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis was restricted to randomized controlled trials in which menstrual blood loss was reported using pictorial blood loss assessment chart scores. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials that included 390 women (levonorgestrel intrauterine system, n=196; endometrial ablation, n=194) were retrieved. Three studies pertained to first-generation endometrial ablation (manual hysteroscopy) and three to second-generation endometrial ablation (thermal balloon). Study characteristics and quality were recorded for each study. Data on the effect of treatment on pictorial blood loss assessment chart scores were abstracted, integrated with meta-analysis techniques, and presented as weighted mean differences. Both treatment modalities were associated with similar reductions in menstrual blood loss after 6 months (weighted mean difference, -31.96 pictorial blood loss assessment chart score [95% confidence interval (CI), -65.96 to 2.04]), 12 months (weighted mean difference, 7.45 pictorial blood loss assessment chart score [95% CI, -12.37 to 27.26]), and 24 months (weighted mean difference, -26.70 pictorial blood loss assessment chart score [95% CI, -78.54 to 25.15]). In addition, both treatments were generally associated with similar improvements in quality of life in five studies that reported this as an outcome. No major complications occurred with either treatment modality in these small trials. CONCLUSION: Based on the meta-analysis of six randomized clinical trials, the efficacy of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in the management of heavy menstrual bleeding appears to have similar therapeutic effects to that of endometrial ablation up to 2 years after treatment.
机译:目的:比较左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统和子宫内膜消融术对减少月经期大出血的作用。数据来源:截至2009年1月,使用Ovid在线搜索Medline和EMBASE以及已发表文章的参考文献列表,以鉴定比较左炔诺孕酮子宫内膜系统和子宫内膜消融术治疗严重经期出血的随机对照试验。研究的选择方法:本系统回顾和荟萃分析仅限于使用图形失血量评估图评分报告月经失血的随机对照试验。表,整合和结果:检索了六项随机对照试验,其中包括390名妇女(左炔诺孕酮子宫内系统,n = 196;子宫内膜消融,n = 194)。三项研究涉及第一代子宫内膜消融(手动宫腔镜检查),三项研究涉及第二代子宫内膜消融(热气球)。记录每个研究的研究特征和质量。将有关治疗效果对图形失血量评估图评分的数据进行抽象,并与荟萃分析技术集成,并以加权均数差异表示。两种治疗方式均与6个月后月经失血减少相似(加权平均差异,-31.96图示失血评估图评分[95%置信区间(CI),-65.96至2.04]),以及12个月(加权平均差异) ,7.45图形失血量评估图评分[95%CI,-12.37至27.26])和24个月(加权平均差异-26.70图形失血量评估图评分[95%CI,-78.54至25.15])。此外,在五项报告为结果的研究中,两种治疗方法通常都可以改善生活质量。在这些小型试验中,两种治疗方式均未发生重大并发症。结论:基于六项随机临床试验的荟萃分析,左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器在治疗大经期出血方面的疗效似乎与子宫内膜消融治疗相似,直至治疗2年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号