首页> 外文期刊>Occupational and environmental medicine >Intervention development in occupational research: an example from the printing industry.
【24h】

Intervention development in occupational research: an example from the printing industry.

机译:职业研究中的干预发展:以印刷业为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Intervention development research is an essential prerequisite of any study that attempts to determine whether specific interventions work to prevent work related injury and illness. METHODS: Focus groups (n = 5) and direct observational studies (n = 21) of printers were used to elicit key issues that would aid the development of subsequent interventions. Transcripts from these were analysed by standard qualitative methods to identify common and related themes. RESULTS: The views of managers differed significantly from those of print workers in a number of areas, and working practices did not always follow policy. The majority of printers did not perceive dermatitis to be a major problem, although many complained of dry hands. Other key results included: the lack of skin care policy in most companies; poor understanding of the nature, causes, and treatment of dermatitis; low priority of dermatitis within health and safety concerns; little or no provision of occupational health services, particularly skin checks; variability in provision of and access to appropriate skin protection; and lack of accessible washing facilities. CONCLUSIONS: As a result it was decided to evaluate the implementation of four INTERVENTIONS: provision of (1) skin checks and treatment advice; (2) gloves of the correct type and size, and use of an after-work cream; (3) information on dermatitis within the printing industry; and (4) development of best practice skin care policy.
机译:背景:干预发展研究是任何试图确定特定干预措施是否能预防与工作有关的伤害和疾病的研究的必要前提。方法:使用打印机的焦点小组(n = 5)和直接观察研究(n = 21)来提出关键问题,这将有助于后续干预措施的发展。通过标准的定性方法对这些成绩单进行分析,以找出共同的主题和相关主题。结果:在许多领域,管理人员的观点与印刷工人的观点存在很大差异,并且工作实践并非始终遵循政策。大多数打印机认为皮炎不是主要问题,尽管许多人抱怨手干。其他主要结果包括:大多数公司缺乏皮肤护理政策;对皮炎的性质,原因和治疗的了解不​​足;在健康和安全方面,皮炎的优先级较低;很少或根本没有提供职业卫生服务,尤其是皮肤检查;提供和获得适当的皮肤保护方面的差异;而且缺乏便利的洗涤设施。结论:因此,决定评估四项干预措施的实施情况:(1)提供皮肤检查和治疗建议; (2)正确类型和大小的手套,以及工作后使用的乳霜; (3)印刷业中有关皮炎的信息; (4)制定最佳实践皮肤护理政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号