首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology international. >Comparative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, with or without methotrexate, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Comparative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, with or without methotrexate, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:托法替尼联合或不联合甲氨蝶呤在活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的比较疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily, or in combination with methotrexate (MTX), in patients with active RA. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in patients with active RA were included in this network meta-analysis. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine the direct and indirect evidence from the RCTs. Ten RCTs including 4867 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 21 pairwise comparisons including 11 direct comparisons of seven interventions. The ACR20 response rate was significantly higher in the tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX group than in the placebo and MTX groups (OR 7.56, 95 % credible interval (CrI) 3.07-21.16; OR 3.67, 95 % CrI 2.60-5.71, respectively). Ranking probabilities based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that tofacitinib 10 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.9254), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.7156), adalimumab 40 mg + MTX (SUCRA = 0.6097), tofacitinib 10 mg (SUCRA = 0.5984), tofacitinib 5 mg (SUCRA = 0.4749), MTX (SUCRA = 0.1674), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.0086). In contrast, the safety based on the number of withdrawals due to adverse events did not differ significantly among the seven interventions. Tofacitinib, at dosages 5 and 10 mg twice daily, in combination with MTX, was the most efficacious intervention for active RA and was not associated with a significant risk for withdrawals due to adverse events.
机译:这项研究旨在评估托法替尼5和10 mg每日两次或联合甲氨蝶呤(MTX)在活动性RA患者中的相对疗效和安全性。该网络荟萃分析包括检查托法替尼在活动性RA患者中的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们进行了贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,以结合来自RCT的直接和间接证据。包括4867例患者在内的10项RCT符合纳入标准。有21个成对比较,包括七个干预的11个直接比较。托法替尼10 mg + MTX组的ACR20反应率显着高于安慰剂和MTX组(OR 7.56,95%可信区间(CrI)3.07-21.16; OR 3.67,95%CrI 2.60-5.71)。基于累积排名曲线(SUCRA)下表面的排名概率表明,托法替尼10 mg + MTX最有可能成为达到ACR20缓解率的最佳疗法(SUCRA = 0.9254),其次是托法替尼5 mg + MTX( SUCRA = 0.7156),阿达木单抗40 mg + MTX(SUCRA = 0.6097),托法替尼10 mg(SUCRA = 0.5984),托法替尼5 mg(SUCRA = 0.4749),MTX(SUCRA = 0.1674)和安慰剂(SUCRA = 0.0086)。相反,在7种干预措施中,基于不良事件引起的停药次数的安全性没有显着差异。每日两次5和10 mg托法替尼与MTX联用,是对活动性RA最有效的干预措施,并且与不良事件引起的重大停药风险无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号