首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Randomised controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support. 1. Skill acquisition at bronze stage.
【24h】

Randomised controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support. 1. Skill acquisition at bronze stage.

机译:分阶段教学以进行基本生活支持的随机对照试验。 1.在青铜阶段获得技能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have investigated a method of teaching community CPR in three stages instead of in a single session. These have been designated bronze, silver, and gold stages. The first involves only opening of the airway and chest compression with back blows for choking, the second adds ventilation in a ratio of compressions to breaths of 50:5, and the third is a conversion to conventional CPR. In a controlled randomised trial of 495 trainees we compared the performance in tests immediately after instruction of those who had received a conventional course and those who had had the simpler bronze level tuition. The tests were based on video recordings of simulated resuscitation scenarios and the readouts from recording manikins. Differences occurred as a direct consequence of ventilation being required in one group and not the other, some variation probably followed from unforeseen minor changes in the way that instruction was given, whilst others may have followed from the greater simplicity in the new method of training. A careful approach was followed by slightly more trainees in the conventional group whilst appreciably more in the bronze group remembered to shout for help (44% vs. 71%). A clear advantage was also seen for bronze level training in terms of those who opened the airway as taught (35% vs. 56%), for checking breathing (66% vs. 88%), and for mentioning the need to phone for an ambulance (21% vs. 32%). Little difference was observed in correct or acceptable hand position between the conventional group who were given detailed guidance and the bronze group who were instructed only to push on the centre of the chest. The biggest differences related to the number of compressions given. The mean delay to first compression was 63 s and 34 s, and the mean duration of pauses between compressions was 16 s and 9 s, respectively. Average performed rates were similar in the two groups, but more in the conventional group compressed too slowly whereas more in the bronze group compressed too rapidly. Observations were made for only three cycles of compression, but extrapolating these to the 8 min often considered a watershed for chances of survival for victims of cardiac arrest, an average of 308 compressions would be expected from those using conventional CPR compared with 675 for those using bronze level CPR. The implications of this difference are discussed.
机译:我们研究了一种在三个阶段而不是单个会话中教授社区心肺复苏的方法。这些已被指定为青铜,银和金阶段。第一种仅涉及气道的打开和胸部按压,并带有用于抑制窒息的后吹力;第二种涉及以50:5的压缩与呼吸比率增加通气,第三种是向常规CPR的转换。在495名受训者的随机对照试验中,我们比较了接受常规课程的学生和接受过简单铜牌课程的学生在受训后的测试表现。测试基于模拟复苏方案的视频记录和人体模型的读数。差异的产生是一组而不是另一组需要通气的直接结果,某些变化可能是由于教学方式的意外变化所致,而其他变化可能是由于新的训练方法更加简单。谨慎的做法是,常规组的学员略多一些,而青铜组的学员记得要大声呼救(44%vs. 71%)。对于青铜级训练,在按示教的方法打开气道的人(35%比56%),检查呼吸(66%对88%)以及提及需要打电话给呼吸道方面,也有明显的优势。救护车(21%对32%)。在接受了详细指导的常规组和仅被指示要按压胸部中心的青铜组之间,在正确或可接受的手部位置上观察到的差异很小。最大的差异与给定的压缩次数有关。第一次压缩的平均延迟时间为63 s和34 s,两次压缩之间的平均暂停时间分别为16 s和9 s。两组的平均执行率相似,但常规组的压缩速度太慢,而青铜板的压缩速度太快。仅对三个压缩周期进行了观察,但将其推算为通常被认为是心跳骤停受害者生存机会的8分钟的分水岭,使用常规CPR的患者平均预期进行308次压缩,而使用CPR的则为675次青铜级心肺复苏术。讨论了这种差异的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号