首页> 外文期刊>Respirology : >Positive benefits of theophylline in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of low-dose, slow-release theophylline in the treatment of COPD for 1 year.
【24h】

Positive benefits of theophylline in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of low-dose, slow-release theophylline in the treatment of COPD for 1 year.

机译:茶碱在低剂量,缓释茶碱治疗COPD 1年的随机,双盲,平行组,安慰剂对照研究中的积极益处。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that low-dose theophylline has anti-inflammatory benefits and is safe in the treatment of COPD. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose, slow-release oral theophylline administered over a 1-year period in patients with COPD. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial was carried out. In total, 110 participants with COPD were randomly assigned to receive slow-release theophylline (100 mg b.i.d.) or placebo for 1 year. Use of medicine and symptoms recorded by diary cards; pulmonary function, exacerbations of COPD, quality of life and the use of rescue medicine were evaluated. Superiority test was used to estimate the efficacy. RESULTS: Of 110 participants, 85 (77.3%) complied with the protocol, with 42 subjects in theophylline and 43 subjects on placebo. In both intention-to-treat and per-protocol population analysis, greater improvement in pre-bronchodilator FEV(1) (P = 0.038 and P = 0.070, respectively), lower frequency of COPD exacerbations (P = 0.047 and P = 0.035, respectively), fewer days of COPD exacerbations (P = 0.045 and P = 0.046, respectively), lower frequency of clinical visits (P = 0.017 and P = 0.039, respectively), greater improvement in satisfaction with treatment (P = 0.014 and P = 0.004, respectively) were found in the theophylline group than in the placebo group. In per-protocol population, greater improvements in quality of life (P = 0.047) were also observed in the theophylline group and the mean time to the first exacerbation was delayed in theophylline group in comparison with placebo group (P = 0.047). Drug-related adverse events such as stomach discomfort (3.51%), headache (3.51%), insomnia (1.75%) and palpitation (1.75%) were found in the theophylline group. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose, slow-release oral theophylline is effective and well-tolerated in the long term treatment of stable COPD, although it does not improve post-bronchodilator lung function.
机译:目的和背景:越来越多的证据表明,低剂量茶碱具有抗炎作用,并且在治疗COPD方面是安全的。这项研究旨在评估低剂量,缓释口服茶碱在1年内对COPD患者的疗效和安全性。方法:进行了一项随机,双盲,平行组,安慰剂对照试验。总共有110名COPD参与者被随机分配接受缓释茶碱(100 mg b.i.d.)或安慰剂1年。日记卡记录的药物使用和症状的使用;评估肺功能,COPD恶化,生活质量和急救药物的使用。优越性测试用于评估疗效。结果:110名参与者中,有85名(77.3%)符合该方案,其中茶碱中有42名受试者,安慰剂组中有43名受试者。在意向性治疗和按方案人群分析中,支气管扩张剂前FEV(1)的改善更大(分别为P = 0.038和P = 0.070),COPD急性发作的频率较低(P = 0.047和P = 0.035, ),COPD恶化的天数减少(分别为P = 0.045和P = 0.046),临床就诊频率较低(分别为P = 0.017和P = 0.039),对治疗满意度的改善更大(P = 0.014和P =茶碱组比安慰剂组分别为0.004和0.004。在按方案人群中,茶碱组的生活质量也得到了更大的改善(P = 0.047),与安慰剂组相比,茶碱组的平均首次发作时间延迟了(P = 0.047)。茶碱组发现与药物相关的不良事件,如胃部不适(3.51%),头痛(3.51%),失眠(1.75%)和心慌(1.75%)。结论:低剂量,缓释口服茶碱在长期治疗稳定型COPD方面有效且耐受性好,尽管它不能改善支气管扩张剂后的肺功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号