...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory medicine >Efficacy and safety of oxitropium bromide, theophylline and their combination in COPD patients: a double-blind, randomized, multicentre study (BREATH Trial).
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of oxitropium bromide, theophylline and their combination in COPD patients: a double-blind, randomized, multicentre study (BREATH Trial).

机译:溴化氧托昔铵,茶碱及其组合在COPD患者中的疗效和安全性:一项双盲,随机,多中心研究(呼吸试验)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compare the efficacy including spirometry, peak expiratory flow (PEFR) and quality of life and safety of an 8-week treatment with inhaled oxitropium, theophylline or their combination in patients with mild-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy randomized, parallel-group study at 29 Italian outpatients clinics. A group of 236 patients with mild-to-severe COPD (baseline FEV1 < or = 70% of predicted value) were recruited. Treatments were as follows: Inhaled oxitropium bromide 200 microg (N=75), sustained-release oral theophylline 300 mg (N=81) or their combination (N=80), taken twice daily. Spirometry (FEV1 and FVC) was evaluated every 4 weeks, and morning and evening PEFR (before and 2-4 h after drug intake) was measured daily. Symptoms, cough and dysponea, were recorded daily. Health status was evaluated at baseline and week 8 using the disease specific St George' Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Any adverse event occurring during the treatment period was recorded on a diary card. FEV1 and FVC improved in all the groups at 4 and 8 weeks, but the difference between treatment groups did not reach statistically significant levels. Differences between groups in pre-dosing morning and evening PEFR were not significant. Post-dosing morning and evening PEFR were increased and the largest increase was seen in patients treated with both drugs. However, differences between groups was significant only for evening values (P=0.008). The proportion of patients who experienced a decrease in symptoms was high in all groups but no differences among groups were observed. SGRQ total scores decreased in all treatment groups after 8 weeks, particularly in the oxitropium and combination groups. Clinically significant change (> or = 4 units) was only observed in patients treated with oxitropium bromide whether with or without theophylline. Adverse events related to treatments were higher in the group treated with theophylline alone (P < 0.02). We conclude that inhaled oxitropium bromide alone was associated with an improvement in FEV1, PEFR and symptoms in patients with COPD that was not statistically different from that of oral theophylline alone or of the combination of both drugs. Oxitropium bromide in combination with theophylline provided a greater improvement in evening post-dosing PEFR. Oxitropium bromide alone or in combination with theophylline improved the quality of life better than theophylline alone.
机译:我们比较了在轻度至重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中使用吸入的氧养蛋白,茶碱或其组合进行为期8周的治疗的有效性,包括肺活量测定,峰值呼气流量(PEFR)以及生活质量和安全性。我们在29家意大利门诊诊所进行了多中心,双盲,双虚拟随机,平行分组研究。招募了236名轻度至重度COPD患者(基线FEV1 <或=预测值的70%)。治疗方法如下:每天吸入两次200克吸入式氧托溴铵(N = 75),缓释口服茶碱300 mg(N = 81)或它们的组合(N = 80)。每4周评估肺活量(FEV1和FVC),并每天早晨和晚上测量PEFR(在服药前和服药后2-4小时)。每天记录症状,咳嗽和呼吸困难。使用特定疾病的圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)在基线和第8周评估健康状况。在治疗期间发生的任何不良事件都记录在日记卡上。在第4周和第8周,所有组的FEV1和FVC均有改善,但治疗组之间的差异未达到统计学上的显着水平。早晨和晚上PEFR的给药前两组之间的差异不显着。服药后早晨和晚上的PEFR均增加,并且在两种药物治疗的患者中观察到的增幅最大。但是,组之间的差异仅在夜间值上才有意义(P = 0.008)。在所有组中,症状减轻的患者比例均较高,但各组之间均未观察到差异。 8周后,所有治疗组的SGRQ总得分均下降,尤其是在氧放疗和联合治疗组中。临床上的显着变化(>或= 4个单位)仅在使用氧托溴铵治疗的患者中观察到,无论是否使用茶碱。单独用茶碱治疗的组中与治疗相关的不良事件较高(P <0.02)。我们得出的结论是,单独吸入的氧托溴铵与COPD患者的FEV1,PEFR和症状改善相关,与口服茶碱或两种药物的口服治疗无统计学差异。溴氧嘧啶与茶碱的组合在给药后的傍晚PEFR方面有更大的改善。单独或与茶碱合用的氧托溴铵比单独使用茶碱改善生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号