...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory medicine >The characteristics of different diagnostic tests in adult mild asthmatic patients: comparison with patients with asthma-like symptoms by gastro-oesophageal reflux.
【24h】

The characteristics of different diagnostic tests in adult mild asthmatic patients: comparison with patients with asthma-like symptoms by gastro-oesophageal reflux.

机译:成人轻度哮喘患者不同诊断测试的特征:与胃食管反流引起的哮喘样症状患者的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing asthma cannot be always easy. It is important to consider the validity of the diagnostic tests, and/or how much more commonly they are positive in patients with asthma compared to healthy subjects and, particularly, to patients with asthma-like symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of diagnostic tests for asthma, in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, in patients with bronchial asthma compared to patients affected by gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with asthma-like symptoms, and healthy control subjects without asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER). DESIGN: Single-center, cross-sectional, observational study. PATIENTS: We studied 60 patients with mild asthma, 30 patients with GERD and asthma-like symptoms and 25 healthy control subjects. MEASUREMENTS: We measured provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in the forced expiratory volume in 1s (MCh PC(20)/FEV(1)), the amplitude percent mean of peak expiratory flow (A%M of PEF), derived from twice-daily readings for >2 weeks, the FEV(1)/forced vital capacity (FEV(1)/FVC) ratio, the eosinophil count in blood and in induced sputum and the serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels. RESULTS: FEV(1)/FVC ratio, A%M of PEF, blood eosinophils counts and serum ECP levels were less sensitive and specific when the reference population was composed of patients with asthma-like symptoms by GER. While, MCh PC(20)/FEV(1) and induced sputum eosinophils count were the most sensitive (both 90%) and specific (89% and 92%, respectively) tests. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that MCh PC(20)/FEV(1) and the induced sputum eosinophil count are the most useful objective tests in patients with mild asthma. All patients with asthma presented both an MCh PC(20)/FEV(1) <1500 microg and eosinophils count in the induced sputum >1%.
机译:背景:诊断哮喘并不总是那么容易。重要的是要考虑诊断测试的有效性,和/或与健康受试者,尤其是患有哮喘样症状的患者相比,哮喘患者中阳性的诊断率更高。目的:从敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值方面评估哮喘诊断测试与患有哮喘样症状的胃食管反流病(GERD)患者相比,支气管哮喘的有效性,以及没有哮喘和胃食管反流(GER)的健康对照受试者。设计:单中心,横断面,观察性研究。患者:我们研究了60例轻度哮喘患者,30例具有GERD和哮喘样症状的患者以及25例健康对照者。测量:我们测量了乙酰甲胆碱的刺激性浓度,该浓度在1秒钟内引起强制性呼气量下降20%(MCh PC(20)/ FEV(1)),这是峰值呼气流量的振幅百分比平均值(PEF的A%M),从每天两次读数> 2周,FEV(1)/强制肺活量(FEV(1)/ FVC)比率,血液和诱导痰中的嗜酸性粒细胞计数以及血清嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白(ECP)水平。结果:当参考人群由患有GER的哮喘样症状的患者组成时,FEV(1)/ FVC比率,PEF的A%M,血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数和血清ECP水平较不敏感和特异。同时,MCh PC(20)/ FEV(1)和诱导的痰嗜酸性粒细胞计数是最敏感的测试(均为90%)和特异性测试(分别为89%和92%)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,MCh PC(20)/ FEV(1)和诱导的痰嗜酸性粒细胞计数是轻度哮喘患者最有用的客观检查。所有哮喘患者均表现出MCh PC(20)/ FEV(1)<1500 microg,并且诱导痰中的嗜酸性粒细胞计数> 1%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号