首页> 外文期刊>Renal failure. >A comparison between residual renal function and peritoneal clearance for Na/H2O and urea removal in peritoneal dialysis patients
【24h】

A comparison between residual renal function and peritoneal clearance for Na/H2O and urea removal in peritoneal dialysis patients

机译:腹膜透析患者残余肾功能和腹膜清除钠/水和尿素的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: To compare the Na/H2O and urea removal between residual renal function (RRF) and peritoneal clearance (PC) in peritoneal dialysis patients. Try to explore the difference between RRF and PC in prognosis of chronic kidney disease patients who need peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment. Methods: Weekly Na/H2O and urea removal by PC and RRF were investigated individually. Independent samples t-test was carried out to compare the efficiency of removal between RRF and PC treatment. Pearson correlated analysis was applied to reveal the relationship between Na/H2O and urea removal and Kt/V. Results: Although a higher Na/H2O removal rate by RRF was showed in this investigation, the difference was not statistical significant compared to the one by PC. On the other hand, urea removal by RRF was obviously higher than PC. For every 0.1 Kt/V, Na/H2O removal by RRF was distinctly higher than PD. The Na and H2O removal of RRF were 147.88 +/- 83.72 mmol and 46.54 +/- 39.11 mmol, respectively; and the ones of PD were 11.40 +/- 6.08 mmol and 4.47 +/- 4.79 mmol. By using statistical assay, the correlations relevance between Na/H2O removal and Kt/V in RRF were showed stronger than in PC. However, the total removal of Na/H2O showed a poor correlation with Kt/V in both RRF and PC. Conclusions: The removal efficiency of RRF is much higher than PC. This study suggests that it is important to adjust dialysis program when RRF gets declined. Also the correlation between Na/H2O removal rate and Kt/V is an important monitoring factor for the patients who are receiving peritoneal dialysis.
机译:背景:为了比较腹膜透析患者的残余肾功能(RRF)和腹膜清除率(PC)之间的Na / H2O和尿素去除率。尝试探讨RRF和PC在需要腹膜透析(PD)治疗的慢性肾脏疾病患者的预后中的区别。方法:分别研究PC和RRF每周去除Na / H2O和尿素的情况。进行独立样本t检验以比较RRF和PC处理之间的去除效率。应用Pearson相关分析揭示了Na / H2O与尿素去除率和Kt / V之间的关系。结果:尽管这项研究显示通过RRF去除Na / H2O的速率更高,但与PC相比,差异无统计学意义。另一方面,RRF去除尿素明显高于PC。对于每0.1 Kt / V,RRF去除Na / H2O明显高于PD。 RRF的Na和H2O去除分别为147.88 +/- 83.72 mmol和46.54 +/- 39.11 mmol; PD的值为11.40 +/- 6.08mmol和4.47 +/- 4.79mmol。通过统计学分析,RRF中Na / H2O去除与Kt / V之间的相关性强于PC。但是,RRF和PC中Na / H2O的总去除量与Kt / V的相关性很差。结论:RRF的去除效率远高于PC。这项研究表明,当RRF下降时,调整透析程序非常重要。 Na / H2O去除率和Kt / V之间的相关性也是接受腹膜透析患者的重要监测因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号