首页> 外文期刊>Reference services review >Still a mixed bag: A study of first-year composition students' internet citations at the University of Mississippi
【24h】

Still a mixed bag: A study of first-year composition students' internet citations at the University of Mississippi

机译:仍是一团糟:密西西比大学一年级学生对互联网的引文研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study seeks to gauge student use of open internet sources for the purpose of refining instruction and information literacy pedagogy in the library. Design/methodology/approach: The authors obtained citations from seven spring 2009 freshman composition classes at the University of Mississippi. From this pool of roughly 230 students, 437 citations to the open web were isolated, examined, and coded for analysis. Findings: Examination of the individual web sites, their URLs, and relevant codes revealed heavy student use of online reference and how-to materials, many of which were less than ideal as academic sources, but not openly inappropriate as such. Research limitations/implications: The citations were stripped of all personal information at the department's request; therefore the research does not and cannot comment on student topics and individual assignments. The findings suggest that University of Mississippi students may be able to identify and avoid low quality sources but struggle with mediocre ones, and that use of online reference works represents low student awareness of library reference collections. Practical implications: The results suggest that a greater emphasis on open web sources, possibly as supplemental tutorials or videos, may be useful in the context of first-year composition library instruction. Originality/value: This study provides statistical data about college freshmen and their citations in a first-year writing class in addition to a thorough literature review of similar studies, both of which will be of interest to instruction librarians and writing program liaisons.
机译:本研究旨在评估学生对开放互联网资源的使用情况,以完善图书馆中的教学和信息素养教育学。设计/方法/方法:作者从密西西比大学的2009年春季学期的七门新生作文课中获得了引文。从大约230名学生中,隔离,检查和编码了437个对开放网络的引用,并进行了编码以进行分析。调查结果:对单个网站,其URL和相关代码的检查表明,学生大量使用在线参考资料和使用方法资料,其中许多都不是理想的学术资源,但也不是公开的。研究的局限性/意义:应部门要求,删除了所有个人信息的引用;因此,这项研究不会也不能评论学生的话题和个人作业。研究结果表明,密西西比大学的学生也许能够识别和避免低质量的资源,但是却与平庸的资源作斗争,并且使用在线参考书目意味着学生对图书馆参考书集的认识较低。实际意义:结果表明,在第一年作文库教学的背景下,更多地强调开放式网络资源(可能作为补充教程或视频)可能会有用。原创性/价值:该研究除了提供对类似研究的详尽文献综述之外,还提供有关大学新生及其在第一年写作课中被引用的统计数据,这对于指导图书馆员和写作计划联络员都将是有意义的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号