...
首页> 外文期刊>Livestock Science >A comparison of the carcass traits and meat quality of conventionally and organically produced rabbits
【24h】

A comparison of the carcass traits and meat quality of conventionally and organically produced rabbits

机译:常规兔和有机兔的the体性状和肉质比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In order to compare the meat of conventionally and organically produced rabbits for possible future sale, two groups of 50 rabbits from the same genetic type were reared under conventional or Spanish organic conditions and were slaughtered at 63 or 90 days respectively. Differences were found in most of the characteristics studied. In some of the traits the differences were related to age, as in the case of the liveweight (2209 vs. 2488 g), the weight of the different parts of the carcass, texture variables of meat, meat redness (a* 5.51 vs. 7.49), carcass redness (a* 2.92 vs. 3.70), or pH (5.82 vs. 5.76) in conventionally and organically reared rabbits, respectively. However, in other cases the variations were not age related. Organic rabbits had a higher carcass length to circumference ratio (2.22 vs. 1.97). Their carcasses were leaner (13.9 vs. 27.3 g fat/kg carcass) and had a lower meat to bone ratio (5.18 vs. 5.84) than in conventional rabbits. The organic meat had less protein (210 vs. 213 g/kg meat) and fewer lipids (19 vs. 39 g/kg meat). It had less saturated FA (41.3 vs. 42.6 g/100 g total FA) and less monounsaturated FA (29.4 vs. 35.6) but more polyunsaturated FA (28.9 vs. 21.9), n-6 FA (25.3 vs. 19.4) and n-3 FA (2.7 vs. 2.4). The ratio of polyunsaturated:saturated FA was higher (0.7 vs. 0.5) in the organic meat and, as such, was better from the nutritional perspective, but the n-6: n-3 ratio was higher (9.3 vs. 8.1) and poorer. The proteins in the organic meat were richer in methionine (12.78 vs. 4.33 mg/100 g meat) and cystine (4.47 vs. 1.71) although these results require further study. The organic rabbit meat had a reduced aniseed (0.23 vs. 0. 79) and grass flavour (0.44 vs. 0.56), but higher liver flavour (1.49 vs. 1.02) than conventional rabbit meat.
机译:为了比较常规和有机生产的兔子的肉以供将来出售,在常规或西班牙有机条件下饲养了两组具有相同遗传类型的50只兔子,分别在63天或90天屠宰。在研究的大多数特征中发现差异。在某些性状中,差异与年龄有关,例如活重(2209对2488克),car体不同部位的重量,肉的质地变量,肉的发红(a * 5.51对。 7.49),传统和有机饲养兔子的rear体发红(a * 2.92对3.70)或pH(5.82对5.76)。但是,在其他情况下,差异与年龄无关。有机兔的car体长与周长之比较高(2.22对1.97)。他们的尸体比传统的兔子更瘦(13.9 vs. 27.3 g脂肪/ kg尸体),并且肉骨比更低(5.18 vs. 5.84)。有机肉的蛋白质较少(210肉比213 g / kg肉),脂质也较少(19肉比39 g / kg肉)。它具有较少的饱和FA(41.3对42.6 g / 100 g总FA)和较少的单不饱和FA(29.4对35.6),但是多不饱和FA(28.9对21.9),n-6 FA(25.3对19.4)和n -3 FA(2.7对2.4)。有机肉中多不饱和脂肪酸:饱和脂肪酸的比例较高(0.7比0.5),因此从营养角度来看更好,但是n-6:n-3比例较高(9.3比8.1),并且较差有机肉中的蛋白质富含蛋氨酸(12.78比4.33 mg / 100 g肉)和胱氨酸(4.47比1.71),尽管这些结果需要进一步研究。有机兔肉的八角茴香(0.23 vs. 0. 79)和草味(0.44 vs. 0.56)减少,但肝味(1.49 vs. 1.02)高于传统兔肉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号