首页> 外文期刊>LWT-Food Science & Technology >Drying kinetics and quality attributes of jujube (Zizyphus jujuba Miller) slices dried by hot-air and short- and medium-wave infrared radiation
【24h】

Drying kinetics and quality attributes of jujube (Zizyphus jujuba Miller) slices dried by hot-air and short- and medium-wave infrared radiation

机译:热风和短波和中波红外辐射干燥的枣片的干燥动力学和品质属性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As representatives of the traditional and innovative drying method, hot-air (HA) and short- and medium-wave infrared radiation (SMIR) drying were chosen to conduct comparative study, respectively. In the present study, drying kinetics of jujube slices during HA and SMIR drying at 60, 70, 80 and 90 degrees C were investigated, quality attributes such as color, vitamin C (VC), total flavonoids content (TFC) and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) content of dried jujube slices were evaluated. Both HA and SMIR drying process occurred mainly in the falling rate period. Drying time used in SMIR drying was 33 similar to 83% of that in HA drying. Logarithmic model and Two-term model were the best in describing the drying process in HA and SMIR drying, respectively. D-eff values of jujube slices were varied from 1.43 x 10(-8) to 2.28 x 10(-7) m(2)/s. Values of D-eff in SMIR drying were two times higher than HA drying. jujube slices dried by SMIR revealed better color, higher retentions of VC, TFC and CAMP content than HA drying. Compared with HA drying, SMIR drying showed shorter drying time, higher drying efficiency and better quality of products, indicating SMIR drying was a more promising drying method for jujube processing. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:作为传统和创新干燥方法的代表,分别选择了热风(HA)和短波和中波红外辐射(SMIR)干燥进行比较研究。在本研究中,研究了在60、70、80和90摄氏度下HA和SMIR干燥过程中枣片的干燥动力学,质量属性如颜色,维生素C(VC),总类黄酮含量(TFC)和环状单磷酸腺苷评价了干燥的枣切片的(cAMP)含量。 HA和SMIR干燥过程均主要发生在下降速率时期。 SMIR干燥中使用的干燥时间为33,类似于HA干燥中的83%。对数模型和二项模型分别是描述HA和SMIR干燥过程的最佳过程。枣切片的D-eff值从1.43 x 10(-8)到2.28 x 10(-7)m(2)/ s不等。 SMIR干燥的D-eff值是HA干燥的两倍。与HA干燥相比,SMIR干燥的枣切片显示出更好的颜色,更高的VC,TFC和CAMP含量保留率。与HA干燥相比,SMIR干燥具有更短的干燥时间,更高的干燥效率和更好的产品质量,这表明SMIR干燥是一种更有利于枣加工的干燥方法。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号