首页> 外文期刊>Local environment >Urban agriculture, civil interfaces and moving beyond difference: the experiences of plot holders in Dublin and Belfast
【24h】

Urban agriculture, civil interfaces and moving beyond difference: the experiences of plot holders in Dublin and Belfast

机译:都市农业,民用界面和超越差异:都柏林和贝尔法斯特的土地所有者的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent literature suggests that a "shared politics of place" attained through joint activities fosters social integration and provides people with a means to practise co-operation [Baumann, G., 1996. Contesting culture: discourses of identity in multi-ethnic London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Sanjek, R., 1998. The future of us all: race & neighbourhood policies in New York City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; Sennett, R., 2012. Together: the rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. UK: Penguin]. Such a "shared politics of place" is most likely to occur in the context of public space conceptualised broadly as "the setting for everyday spatial behaviour of individuals and communities, emphasizing ordinary activities of citizens" [Lownsbrough, H. and Beunderman, J., 2007. Equally spaced? Public space and interaction between diverse communities. London: Demos, p. 8]. Here we explore one element of such public space - urban agriculture sites - with a view to identifying the extent to which a "shared politics of place" can be created and nurtured among the cultivating citizenry. The paper draws on data collected on allotment gardening sites in two urban contexts: Dublin (Ireland) and Belfast (Northern Ireland) over the period 2009-2013. We demonstrate the centrality of allotment cultivation to the generation of solidarity, mutuality and trust among participating citizens. Individuals engaging in allotment gardening in both Dublin and Belfast create and sustain civil interfaces - dismantling barriers, exchanging knowledge, challenging stereotypes, generating empathy and getting on with the business of simply getting on with their lives. The modus operandi of allotment gardening is predicated on a willingness to disregard social and ethno-national categorisations while on site. This is not to deny that such differences exist and persist, but allotments offer a "space of potential" where those differences are, at least for a time, rendered less salient.
机译:最近的文献表明,通过联合活动获得的“地方共享政治”促进了社会融合,并为人们提供了进行合作的手段[Baumann,G.,1996。争议文化:伦敦多种族的身份话语。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社; Sanjek,R.,1998年。我们所有人的未来:纽约市的种族与社区政策。纽约州伊萨卡:康奈尔大学出版社; Sennett,R.,2012年。在一起:合作的仪式,娱乐和政治。英国:企鹅]。这种“地方共享政治”最有可能发生在广义上被定义为“个人和社区日常空间行为的环境,强调公民的日常活动”的公共空间的背景下[Lownsbrough,H. and Beunderman,J. ,2007年。等距?公共空间和不同社区之间的互动。伦敦:演示,p。 8]。在这里,我们探讨了这种公共空间的一个要素-城市农业场所-以便确定在不断发展的公民中可以创建和培育“地方共享政治”的程度。本文利用在2009-2013年期间在都柏林(爱尔兰)和贝尔法斯特(北爱尔兰)的两种城市环境下从配发园艺场收集的数据。我们证明了分配耕种对参与公民之间的团结,互助和信任产生的重要性。在都柏林和贝尔法斯特从事分配园艺的个人创建并维持民事界面-消除障碍,交换知识,挑战陈规定型观念,产生同情心并继续从事简单的生活。分配园艺的作案手法是基于在现场时愿意不理会社会和民族民族分类的意愿。这并不是要否认这种差异存在并持续存在,而是分配提供了一个“潜在空间”,其中至少在一时间使这些差异变得不那么明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号