首页> 外文期刊>Land Economics >Fence laws vs. herd laws: a nineteenth-century Kansas paradox
【24h】

Fence laws vs. herd laws: a nineteenth-century Kansas paradox

机译:栅栏法与牧群法:19世纪的堪萨斯悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study considers the conflict between farmers and cattle raisers over the fencing of animals and crops in Kansas during the 1870s. At that time, Kansas counties were given the option to retain the traditional fence laws (requiring crops to be fenced in) or to adopt the herd laws (requiring the restraining of animals by means of herding). Since barbed wire fencing did not reach Kansas until later, and a detailed agricultural census was recorded in 1875, this study tests alternative hypotheses asto why in 1875 approximately half the counties chose fence laws while the others chose herd laws.
机译:这项研究考虑了1870年代堪萨斯州动物和农作物围栏上农民与养牛者之间的冲突。当时,堪萨斯州可以选择保留传统的围栏法律(要求围栏种植农作物)或采用畜群法律(要求通过放牧来限制动物)。由于铁丝网围栏直到后来才到达堪萨斯州,并且在1875年进行了详细的农业普查,因此该研究检验了其他假设,即为什么在1875年大约一半的县选择了围栏法律,而其他县选择了畜群法律。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号