首页> 外文期刊>Laboratory Animals >Preferences for limited versus no contact in SD rats
【24h】

Preferences for limited versus no contact in SD rats

机译:SD大鼠中有限接触与不接触的偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In biomedical research, single housing of rats is used in different test paradigms and the rats are traditionally group-housed prior to testing. Intuitively this separation may have a negative impact on animal welfare. The objective of this study was to assess the importance of non-tactile contact with a social partner. The hypothesis was that rats, previously housed in pairs, prefer non-tactile contact with a partner to single housing. Moreover, it was hypothesized that females show a higher preference for non-tactile contact than males. Animals were housed for 48 h in two-compartment cages, where the animal could choose either to spend time in the compartment, where only a perforated plexiglas wall separated it from its social partner, or to spend time in the compartment with no rat behind the plexiglas barrier. The proportion of time spent in the two compartments was evaluated. We found a significant effect on gender (P = 0.0368) with females spending significantly more time close to the companion animal. During their inactive period, females spent approximately half their time close to their partner, whereas males preferred to stay in the cage next to the empty compartment. Female rats also demonstrated more activity compared with males (P < 0.0001).
机译:在生物医学研究中,在不同的测试范例中使用大鼠的单只住房,并且传统上在测试之前将大鼠分组饲养。直观上,这种分离可能对动物福利产生负面影响。这项研究的目的是评估与社会伙伴的非触觉接触的重要性。假设是,以前成对饲养的大鼠比单笼更喜欢与伴侣进行非触觉接触。此外,据推测,女性对非触觉接触的偏好高于男性。将动物在两个隔间的笼子中关押48小时,在这里,动物可以选择在隔间中度过时光,其中只有穿孔的有机玻璃墙将其与社交伙伴分隔开,或者在隔间中没有大鼠时度过时光。有机玻璃屏障。评估在两个隔室中花费的时间比例。我们发现雌性对性别的影响显着(P = 0.0368),而雌性则花费更多的时间接近伴侣动物。在闲置期间,雌性花了大约一半的时间与伴侣在一起,而雄性则喜欢呆在空的隔间附近的笼子里。雌性大鼠也显示出比雄性更多的活性(P <0.0001)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号