...
首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
【24h】

Early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

机译:非ST段抬高的急性冠脉综合征的早期与延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Studies assessing the timing of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with Non-ST segment elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (NSTE-ACS) have failed to generate a consensus on how early PCI should be performed in such patients. Purpose: This meta-analysis compares clinical outcomes at 30 days in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI within 24 hours of presentation (early PCI) with those receiving PCI more than 24 hours after presentation (delayed PCI). Data Sources: Data were extracted from searches of MEDLINE (1990-2010) and Google scholar and from scrutiny of abstract booklets from major cardiology meetings (1990-2010). Study selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that included the composite endpoint of death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days after PCI were considered. Data Extraction: Two independent reviewers extracted data using standard forms. The effects of early and delayed PCI were analyzed by calculating pooled estimates for death, non-fatal MI, bleeding, repeat revascularization and the composite endpoint of death or non-fatal MI at 30 days. Univariate analysis of each of these variables was used to create odds ratios. Data Synthesis: Seven studies with a total of 13,762 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in the odds of the composite endpoint of death or non-fatal MI at 30 days between patients undergoing early PCI and those receiving delayed PCI (OR-0.83, 95%CI 0.62-1.10). Patients receiving delayed PCI experienced a 33% reduction in the odds of repeat revascularization at 30 days compared to those undergoing early PCI (OR-1.33, 95%CI 1.14-1.56, P=0.0004).Conversely, patients undergoing early PCI experienced lower odds of bleeding than those receiving delayed PCI (OR-0.76, 95%CI 0.63-0.91, P = 0.0003). Conclusions: In NSTE-ACS patients early PCI doesn't reduce the odds of the composite endpoint of death or non-fatal MI at 30 day. This strategy is associated with lower odds of bleeding and higher odds of repeat revascularization at 30 days than a strategy of delayed PCI.
机译:背景:评估非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时机的研究未能就此类患者应如何进行早期PCI达成共识。目的:这项荟萃分析比较了在提示后24小时内接受PCI治疗的NSTE-ACS患者(早期PCI)和在提示后24小时内接受PCI治疗的患者(延迟PCI)在30天时的临床结局。数据来源:数据摘自MEDLINE(1990-2010年)和Google学者的搜索结果以及对主要心脏病学会议(1990-2010年)摘要手册的审查。研究选择:考虑了PCI后30天死亡和非致命性心肌梗塞(MI)的复合终点的随机临床试验(RCT)。数据提取:两名独立的审阅者使用标准表格提取数据。通过计算30天时死亡,非致命性MI,出血,重复血运重建以及死亡或非致命性MI的复合终点的合并估计值,分析了早期PCI和延迟PCI的影响。对这些变量中的每一个进行单变量分析以创建比值比。数据综合:共有13762名患者的7项研究符合纳入标准。接受早期PCI的患者和接受延迟PCI的患者在30天时死亡或非致死性心肌梗死综合终点的几率没有显着差异(OR-0.83,95%CI 0.62-1.10)。与接受早期PCI的患者相比,接受延迟PCI的患者在30天时经历再次血管重建的几率降低了33%(OR-1.33,95%CI 1.14-1.56,P = 0.0004)。与接受延迟PCI的患者相比(OR-0.76,95%CI 0.63-0.91,P = 0.0003)。结论:在NSTE-ACS患者中,早期PCI不能降低30天时死亡或非致命性MI的复合终点的几率。与延迟PCI的策略相比,该策略在30天时的出血几率较低,重复血运重建的几率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号