首页> 外文期刊>Nurse education today >Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students' critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning
【24h】

Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students' critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning

机译:基于问题的学习与传统的讲座对韩国护理学生的批判性思维,解决问题和自主学习的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Problem-based learning (PBL) is a method widely used in nursing education to develop students' critical thinking skills to solve practice problems independently. Although PBL has been used in nursing education in Korea for nearly a decade, few studies have examined its effects on Korean nursing students' learning outcomes, and few Korean studies have examined relationships among these outcomes. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to examine outcome abilities including critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning of nursing students receiving PBL vs. traditional lecture, and to examine correlations among these outcome abilities. Design: A quasi-experimental non-equivalent group pretest-posttest design was used. Participants/Setting: First-year nursing students (N. = 90) were recruited from two different junior colleges in two cities (GY and GJ) in South Korea. Methods: In two selected educational programs, one used traditional lecture methods, while the other used PBL methods. Standardized self-administered questionnaires of critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning abilities were administered before and at 16. weeks (after instruction). Results: Learning outcomes were significantly positively correlated, however outcomes were not statistically different between groups. Students in the PBL group improved across all abilities measured, while student scores in the traditional lecture group decreased in problem-solving and self-directed learning. Critical thinking was positively associated with problem-solving and self-directed learning (r= .71, and r= .50, respectively, p< .001); problem-solving was positively associated with self-directed learning (r= .75, p< .001). Conclusion: Learning outcomes of PBL were not significantly different from traditional lecture in this small underpowered study, despite positive trends. Larger studies are recommended to study effects of PBL on critical student abilities.
机译:背景:基于问题的学习(PBL)是护理教育中广泛使用的一种方法,用于培养学生的批判性思维能力,以独立解决实践问题。尽管PBL在韩国的护理教育中已经使用了近十年,但很少有研究检查其对韩国护理学生学习成果的影响,并且很少有韩国研究研究这些结果之间的关系。目的:本研究的目的是检查结局能力,包括批判性思维,解决问题的能力以及接受PBL与传统讲座的护理学生的自主学习,并研究这些结局能力之间的相关性。设计:使用准实验的非等效组前测-后测设计。参加者/环境:从韩国两个城市(GY和GJ)的两个不同的初级学院招募的一年级护理学生(N. = 90)。方法:在两个选定的教育计划中,一个使用传统的讲课方法,而另一个使用PB​​L方法。在批判性思维,解决问题和自我指导的学习能力的标准自我管理问卷之前和之后16周(在指导后)进行管理。结果:学习结果之间存在显着的正相关,但是两组之间的结果在统计学上没有差异。在解决问题和自主学习方面,PBL组的学生在所有测得的能力上都有所提高,而传统讲座组的学生得分则有所下降。批判性思维与解决问题和自主学习呈正相关(r分别为.71和r = .50,p <.001);解决问题的能力与自我学习正相关(r = .75,p <.001)。结论:尽管有积极的趋势,但在这项小型的动力不足的研究中,PBL的学习成果与传统的演讲并没有显着差异。建议进行较大规模的研究,以研究PBL对关键学生能力的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号