首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Mental state attribution and the temporoparietal junction: an fMRI study comparing belief, emotion, and perception.
【24h】

Mental state attribution and the temporoparietal junction: an fMRI study comparing belief, emotion, and perception.

机译:心理状态归因和颞顶交界处:一项功能磁共振成像研究,比较信念,情感和知觉。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

By age 2, children attribute referential mental states such as perceptions and emotions to themselves and others, yet it is not until age 4 that they attribute representational mental states such as beliefs. This raises an interesting question: is attribution of beliefs different from attribution of perceptions and emotions in terms of its neural substrate? To address this question with a high degree of anatomic specificity, we partitioned the TPJ, a broad area often found to be recruited in theory of mind tasks, into 2 neuroanatomically specific regions of interest: Superior Temporal Sulcus (STS) and Inferior Parietal Lobule (IPL). To maximize behavioral specificity, we designed a tightly controlled verbal task comprised of sets of single sentences--sentences identical except for the type of mental state specified in the verb (belief, emotion, perception, syntax control). Results indicated that attribution of beliefs more strongly recruited both regions of interest than did emotions or perceptions. This is especially surprising with respect to STS, since it is widely reported in the literature to mediate the detection of referential states--among them emotions and perceptions--rather than the inference of beliefs. An explanation is offered that focuses on the differences between verbal stimuli and visual stimuli, and between a process of sentence comprehension and a process of visual detection.
机译:到2岁时,孩子会将自己的参照性心理状态(例如感知和情感)归因于自己和他人,但直到4岁时,他们才将具有代表性的心理状态(例如信仰)归因于自己。这就提出了一个有趣的问题:就其神经底物而言,信念的归因与感知和情感的归因是否不同?为了以高度的解剖学特异性解决这个问题,我们将TPJ划分为2个神经解剖学上特定的感兴趣区域:上颞沟(STS)和下壁顶叶( IPL)。为了最大程度地提高行为的特殊性,我们设计了一个严格控制的口头任务,该任务由单个句子集组成,这些句子除了动词中指定的心理状态类型(信念,情感,感知,语法控制)外,其他句子均相同。结果表明,与情感或感知相比,信念的归因更能吸引两个感兴趣的领域。就STS而言,这尤其令人惊讶,因为在文献中已广泛报道它用来介导对指称状态(包括情绪和感知)的检测,而不是对信念的推断。提供了一种解释,着重于言语刺激和视觉刺激之间的差异,以及句子理解过程和视觉检测过程之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号