首页> 外文期刊>Neurobiology of learning and memory >Muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptor antagonists differentially mediate acquisition of fructose-conditioned flavor preference and quinine-conditioned flavor avoidance in rats
【24h】

Muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptor antagonists differentially mediate acquisition of fructose-conditioned flavor preference and quinine-conditioned flavor avoidance in rats

机译:毒蕈碱和烟碱胆碱能受体拮抗剂差异介导大鼠果糖条件下的风味偏好和奎宁条件下的风味避免

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rats display both conditioned flavor preference (CFP) for fructose, and conditioned flavor avoidance (CFA) following sweet adulteration with quinine. Previous pharmacological analyses revealed that fructose-CFP expression was significantly reduced by dopamine (DA) D1 or D2 antagonists, but not NMDA or opioid antagonists. Fructose-CFP acquisition was significantly reduced by DA D1, DA D2 or NMDA antagonists, but not opioid antagonists. Quinine-CFA acquisition was significantly enhanced and prolonged by DA D1, NMDA or opioid, but not DA D2 antagonists. Cholinergic intemeurons and projections interact with DA systems in the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area. Further, both muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptor signaling have been implicated in sweet intake and development of food-related preferences. Therefore, the present study examined whether systemic administration of muscarinic (scopolamine: SCOP) or nicotinic (mecamylamine: MEC) cholinergic receptor antagonists mediated fructose-CFP expression, fructose-CFP acquisition and quinine-CFA acquisition. For fructose-CFP expression, rats were trained over 10 sessions with a CS+ flavor in 8% fructose and 0.2% saccharin and a CS- flavor in 0.2% saccharin. Two-bottle choice tests with CS+ and CS- flavors mixed in 0.2% saccharin occurred following vehicle, SCOP (0.1-10 mg/kg) and MEC (1-8 mg/kg). For fructose-CFP acquisition, six groups of rats received vehicle, SCOP (1 or 2.5 mg/kg), MEC (4 or 6 mg/kg) or a limited intake vehicle control 0.5 h prior to 10 CS+ and CS- training sessions followed by six 2-bottle CS+ and CS- choice tests in 0.2% saccharin. For quinine-CFA acquisition, five groups of rats received vehicle, SCOP (1 or 2.5 mg/kg) or MEC (4 or 6 mg/kg) 0.5 h prior to 8 one-bottle CS- (8% fructose + 0.2% saccharin: FS) and CS+ (fructose + saccharin + quinine (0.030%: FSQ) training sessions followed by six 2-bottle CS- and CS+ choice tests in fructose-saccharin solutions. Fructose-CFP expression was significantly reduced by SCOP (2.5-10 mg/kg: 65-68%) and MEC (4-8 mg/kg: 67-73%) relative to vehicle (89-90%), that occurred only when antagonist doses reduced total saccharin intake but in which CS+ intake was still significantly higher than CS- intake. Fructose-CFP acquisition was eliminated by SCOP at doses of 1 (40-54%) and 2.5 (45-58%) mg/kg, and was accompanied by a failure to observe CS+ and CS- intake differences during testing relative to vehicle (85-92%) and limited control (74-88%) conditions. In contrast, MEC failed to alter fructose-CFP acquisition. Quinine-CFA acquisition was significantly enhanced and prolonged by MEC at 4(18-24%) and 6 (11-13%) mg/kg relative to vehicle (34-48%). In contrast, SCOP failed to alter quinine-CFA acquisition. These data implicate the cholinergic receptor system in mediating acquisition (learning) of sugar-induced preferences and quinine-induced aversions with muscarinic receptor signaling controlling the former and nicotinic receptor signaling controlling the latter. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:大鼠对果糖表现出条件风味偏爱(CFP),在用奎宁进行甜掺假后也表现出条件风味回避(CFA)。先前的药理分析表明,多巴胺(DA)D1或D2拮抗剂可显着降低果糖CFP的表达,而NMDA或阿片类拮抗剂则不会。 DA D1,DA D2或NMDA拮抗剂可显着减少果糖CFP的获取,但阿片类拮抗剂则不会。 DA D1,NMDA或阿片类药物可显着增强并延长奎宁CFA的获取,但DA D2拮抗剂则不会。胆碱能的内胚层和突起与伏伏核和腹侧被盖区的DA系统相互作用。此外,毒蕈碱和烟碱胆碱能受体信号传导均与甜食摄入和食物相关偏好的发展有关。因此,本研究检查了系统施用毒蕈碱(东:碱:SCOP)或烟碱(甲胺基胺:MEC)胆碱能受体拮抗剂是否介导了果糖-CFP表达,果糖-CFP获取和奎宁-CFA获取。对于果糖-CFP表达,在10个疗程中训练大鼠用8%果糖和0.2%糖精中的CS +风味剂和0.2%糖精中的CS-风味剂。在溶媒,SCOP(0.1-10 mg / kg)和MEC(1-8 mg / kg)之后,进行了CS +和CS-风味剂混合在0.2%糖精中的两瓶选择测试。对于果糖-CFP采集,六组大鼠在进行10次CS +和CS训练之前0.5小时接受媒介物,SCOP(1或2.5 mg / kg),MEC(4或6 mg / kg)或有限摄入媒介物对照。通过在0.2%糖精中进行的六次2瓶CS +和CS-选择试验。对于奎宁-CFA采集,五组大鼠在8瓶单药CS-(8%果糖+ 0.2%糖精)之前0.5小时接受溶媒,SCOP(1或2.5 mg / kg)或MEC(4或6 mg / kg)。 :FS)和CS +(果糖+糖精+奎宁(0.030%:FSQ)培训课程,然后在果糖-糖精溶液中进行六次2瓶CS-和CS +选择试验。SCOP显着降低了果糖CFP的表达(2.5-10 mg / kg:65-68%)和MEC(4-8 mg / kg:67-73%),相对于媒介物(89-90%),仅在拮抗剂剂量降低总糖精摄入量但CS +摄入量为仍显着高于CS摄入量,SCOP以1(40-54%)和2.5(45-58%)mg / kg的剂量消除了果糖CFP的获得,并伴有未能观察到CS +和CS-相对于媒介物(85-92%)和有限对照(74-88%)条件,测试期间的摄入差异;相反,MEC未能改变果糖-CFP的获取; ME显着增强并延长了奎宁-CFA的获取相对于赋形剂(34-48%),C浓度为4(18-24%)和6(11-13%)mg / kg。相反,SCOP未能改变奎宁-CFA的获取。这些数据暗示胆碱能受体系统介导糖诱导的偏好和奎宁诱导的厌恶的获取(学习),其中毒蕈碱受体信号控制前者,而烟碱受体信号控制后者。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号