...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.
【24h】

Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.

机译:淋巴结阳性的对数比对数:R0切除胃癌患者的新型预后指标优于基于数量和基于比率的N类。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) is defined as the log of the ratio between the probability of being a positive lymph nodes and the probability of being a negative lymph nodes when one lymph node is retrieved. The value of LODDS staging system on prognostic assessment for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection is still unclear. METHODS: Clinicopathologic and prognostic data of 2547 gastric cancer patients underwent D2 or D3 lymphadenectomy with R0 surgery were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis indentified LODDS stage was an independent prognostic factor, but not pN classification or rN classification. The scatter plots of the relationship between LODDS and the number, the ratio of nodes metastasis, suggested that the LODDS stage had power to divide patients with the same number or ratio of nodes metastasis into different groups. For patients in each of the pN or rN classifications, significant differences in survival could always be observed among patients in different LODDS stages. However, for patients in each LODDS stage, prognosis was highly homologous between those in different pN or rN classifications. A minimum number of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 10 nodes retrieved should be met for patients in the pN0, pN1, pN2, pN3, and rN0-3 classifications, respectively, unless the hazard risks of death would be underestimated or overestimated. However, LODDS stage could discriminate among 5 groups of patients with highly homologous prognosis, regardless how many nodes retrieved. CONCLUSIONS: The LODDS system is more reliable than the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and American Joint Committee on cancer pN system and the rN system for prognostic assessment.
机译:背景:阳性淋巴结的对数几率(LODDS)定义为取回一个淋巴结时为阳性淋巴结的概率与阴性淋巴结的概率之比的对数。尚不清楚LODDS分期系统对R0切除的胃癌患者预后评估的价值。方法:回顾性分析2547例接受R0手术的D2或D3淋巴结清扫术的胃癌患者的临床病理和预后。结果:多因素分析确定LODDS分期是独立的预后因素,但不是pN分类或rN分类。 LODDS与淋巴结转移的数量,比率之间的关系的散点图表明,LODDS阶段可以将具有相同数目或淋巴结转移的相同数目的患者分为不同的组。对于每种pN或rN分类的患者,始终可以在不同LODDS阶段的患者之间观察到生存率的显着差异。但是,对于每个LODDS阶段的患者,不同pN或rN分类的患者的预后高度相似。对于pN0,pN1,pN2,pN3和rN0-3分类的患者,应分别满足最少10、15、20、25和10个取回节点的数量,除非会低估或高估死亡的死亡风险。 。但是,LODDS阶段可以区分5组高度同源的预后患者,无论检索到多少个结节。结论:LODDS系统比国际癌症防治联合会和美国癌症联合会pN系统和rN系统联合预后评估更可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号