...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Intraoperative molecular assay for sentinel lymph node metastases in early stage breast cancer: a comparative analysis between one-step nucleic acid amplification whole node assay and routine frozen section histology.
【24h】

Intraoperative molecular assay for sentinel lymph node metastases in early stage breast cancer: a comparative analysis between one-step nucleic acid amplification whole node assay and routine frozen section histology.

机译:早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的术中分子分析:一步法核酸扩增全结点分析与常规冰冻切片组织学的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Conventional histopathological examination is limited in measuring accurate total metastatic volume in a lymph node. Recently, a molecular-based procedure to detect lymph node metastases, one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay, has been developed. OSNA assay can assess a whole lymph node and yields semiquantitative results. The authors compared the performance in intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph node metastases with OSNA assay using a whole lymph node versus routine frozen section (FS) histology with a 2 mm-sectioned lymph node. METHODS: Subjects comprised 531 consecutive patients diagnosed with OSNA assay and 618 consecutive patients diagnosed with FS histological examination. The authors compared the sentinel lymph node-positive rate between the OSNA and FS cohorts, and investigated characteristics of patients for whom OSNA could detect metastases but FS could not. OSNA (+) was defined as micrometastasis, and OSNA (++) and (+I) were defined as macrometastasis. RESULTS: OSNA assay detected more cases of sentinel lymph node metastases than FS histology (OSNA 121 of 531, 22.8% vs FS 109 of 618, 17.6%; P = .036), particularly micrometastases (46 of 531, 8.7% vs 28 of 618, 4.5%; P = .0064). There was no difference in macrometastasis detection between OSNA and FS (75 of 531, 14.1% vs 81 of 618, 13.1%; P = .68). OSNA detected more metastases than FS in postmenopausal patients (77 of 302, 25.5% vs 43 of 351, 12.3%; P < .0001), and in tumors without fat invasion (23 of 156, 14.7% vs 6 of 151, 4.0%; P = .012) or lymphovascular invasion (67 of 395, 17.0% vs 45 of 458, 9.8%; P = .042). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative OSNA assay detects more sentinel lymph node metastases, particularly micrometastases, than does FS histology. OSNA assay can also detect more metastases in postmenopausal patients or from less aggressive primary tumors compared with FS histology.
机译:背景:常规的组织病理学检查仅限于测量淋巴结中准确的总转移体积。最近,已经开发出一种基于分子的方法来检测淋巴结转移,即一步法核酸扩增(OSNA)分析。 OSNA分析可以评估整个淋巴结并产生半定量结果。作者比较了使用OSNA分析(使用整个淋巴结)与常规冰冻切片(FS)组织学(切开2毫米的淋巴结)进行OSNA检测的术中检测前哨淋巴结转移的性能。方法:受试者包括531例连续经OSNA分析诊断的患者和618例连续经FS组织学检查诊断的患者。作者比较了OSNA和FS队列之间的前哨淋巴结阳性率,并调查了OSNA可以检测到转移但FS无法检测到的患者的特征。 OSNA(+)被定义为微转移,而OSNA(++)和(+ I)被定义为宏观转移。结果:OSNA分析检测到的前哨淋巴结转移病例多于FS组织学(OSNA 121为531,22.8%vs FS 109为618,17.6%; P = .036),尤其是微转移(531的46,8.7%vs 28) 618,4.5%; P = .0064)。 OSNA和FS之间的宏转移检测没有差异(531中的75,14.1%,而618中的81,13.1%; P = 0.68)。 OSNA在绝经后患者中发现的转移比FS多(FS的为77(302,25.5%vs 351的351,12.3%; P <.0001)),并且在无脂肪浸润的肿瘤中(156的23,14.7%151的6,4.0%) ; P = .012)或淋巴管浸润(395/67,17.0%vs 45/458,9.8%; P = .042)。结论:术中OSNA检测比FS组织学检测到更多的前哨淋巴结转移,尤其是微转移。与FS组织学相比,OSNA分析还可以检测绝经后患者中更多的转移或侵袭性较小的原发肿瘤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号