首页> 外文期刊>Memory & cognition >Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall:The utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning
【24h】

Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall:The utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning

机译:元记忆和关于自由回忆中首要性和新近性效应的学习:在做出学习判断时利用内在和外在线索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although memory researchers know about primacy and recency effects, it is unclear' whether students are aware of these effects and incorporate them when making judgments of learning (JOLs). The present research examined how participants use serial position information (extrinsic cues) when making JOLs after studying each item and snowed that participants rely on the intrinsic qualities of the items and underestimate primacy and recency effects. However, when participants made JOLs prior to studying each item and engaged in multiplestudy-test sessions, their JOLs accurately reflected recall, as well as when serial position information was explicitly provided during the study phase. The findings are interpreted in a cue utilization framework and suggestthat under certain conditions, participants can predict primacy and recency effects.
机译:尽管记忆研究人员了解至高无上的影响和新近度的影响,但尚不清楚'学生是否在做出学习判断(JOL)时就意识到了这些影响并将其纳入其中。本研究检查了参与者在研究每个项目后制作JOL时如何使用序列位置信息(外部提示),并下雪了参与者依赖项目的内在质量并低估了首要性和新近度的影响。但是,当参与者在研究每个项目之前进行JOL并参加多次学习测试时,他们的JOL会准确反映召回率,并且在研究阶段明确提供了串行位置信息。这些发现在提示利用框架中得到解释,并暗示在某些条件下,参与者可以预测至上和近期的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号