首页> 外文期刊>British journal of anaesthesia >Impact of opioid rescue medication for breakthrough pain on the efficacy and tolerability of long-acting opioids in patients with chronic non-malignant pain.
【24h】

Impact of opioid rescue medication for breakthrough pain on the efficacy and tolerability of long-acting opioids in patients with chronic non-malignant pain.

机译:突破性疼痛用阿片类药物抢救药物对慢性非恶性疼痛患者长效阿片类药物的疗效和耐受性的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence that short-acting opioids as rescue medication for breakthrough pain is an optimal long-term treatment strategy in chronic non-malignant pain. We compared clinical studies of long-acting opioids that allowed short-acting opioid rescue medication with those that did not, to determine the impact of opioid rescue medication use on the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of chronic opioid therapy in patients with chronic non-malignant pain. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (1950 to July 2006) and EMBASE (1974 to July 2006) using terms for chronic non-malignant pain and long-acting opioids. Independent review of the search results identified 48 studies that met the study selection criteria. The effect of opioid rescue medication on analgesic efficacy and the incidence of common opioid-related side-effects were analysed using meta-regression. RESULTS: After adjusting for potentially confounding variables (study design and type of opioid), the difference in analgesic efficacy between the 'rescue' and the 'no rescue' studies was not significant, with regression coefficients close to 0 and 95% confidence intervals that excluded an effect of more than 18 points on a 0-100 scale in each case. There was also no significant difference between the 'rescue' and the 'no rescue' studies for the incidence of nausea, constipation, or somnolence in both the unadjusted and the adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that rescue medication with short-acting opioids for breakthrough pain affects analgesic efficacy of long-acting opioids or the incidence of common opioid-related side-effects among chronic non-malignant pain patients.
机译:背景:几乎没有证据表明,短效阿片类药物作为突破性疼痛的抢救药物是慢性非恶性疼痛的最佳长期治疗策略。我们比较了允许使用短效阿片类药物和不使用短效阿片类药物的长效阿片类药物的临床研究,以确定阿片类阿片药物对慢性非恶性疼痛患者对慢性阿片类药物的镇痛效果和耐受性的影响。 。方法:我们搜索MEDLINE(1950年至2006年7月)和EMBASE(1974年至2006年7月),使用的术语是慢性非恶性疼痛和长效阿片类药物。对搜索结果的独立审查确定了符合研究选择标准的48项研究。使用meta回归分析阿片类药物抢救药物对镇痛效果的影响以及常见的阿片类药物相关副作用的发生率。结果:在调整了可能造成混淆的变量(研究设计和阿片类药物的类型)后,“救助”和“无救助”研究之间的镇痛效果差异不显着,回归系数接近0和95%置信区间排除了在每种情况下0-100范围内超过18点的影响。在未经调整和经过调整的分析中,针对恶心,便秘或嗜睡的发生率的“救助”研究与“无营救”研究之间也没有显着差异。结论:我们没有发现证据表明在慢性非恶性疼痛患者中,短效阿片类药物用于突破性疼痛的抢救药物会影响长效阿片类药物的镇痛效果或常见的阿片类药物相关副作用的发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号