...
首页> 外文期刊>Methods: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology >Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening
【24h】

Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening

机译:虚拟筛选中配体富集评估的基准化方法和数据集

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Retrospective small-scale virtual screening (VS) based on benchmarking data sets has been widely used to estimate ligand enrichments of VS approaches in the prospective (i.e. real-world) efforts. However, the intrinsic differences of benchmarking sets to the real screening chemical libraries can cause biased assessment. Herein, we summarize the history of benchmarking methods as well as data sets and highlight three main types of biases found in benchmarking sets, i.e. "analogue bias", "artificial enrichment" and "false negative". In addition, we introduce our recent algorithm to build maximum-unbiased benchmarking sets applicable to both ligand-based and structure-based VS approaches, and its implementations to three important human histone deacetylases (HDACs) isoforms, i.e. HDAC1, HDAC6 and HDAC8. The leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO CV) demonstrates that the benchmarking sets built by our algorithm are maximum-unbiased as measured by property matching, ROC curves and AUCs. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:基于基准数据集的回顾性小规模虚拟筛选(VS)已被广泛用于在预期(即现实世界)工作中估算VS方法的配体富集。但是,基准设置与实际筛选化学库的内在差异可能会导致评估有偏差。在此,我们总结了基准测试方法以及数据集的历史,并重点介绍了在基准测试集中发现的三种主要类型的偏差,即“模拟偏差”,“人工充实”和“假阴性”。此外,我们介绍了我们最新的算法,以构建适用于基于配体和基于结构的VS方法的最大无偏基准设置,以及其对三种重要的人组蛋白脱乙酰基酶(HDAC)亚型即HDAC1,HDAC6和HDAC8的实现。留一法交叉验证(LOO CV)证明,由我们的算法构建的基准测试集在通过属性匹配,ROC曲线和AUC进行测量时是最大无偏的。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号