首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Higher risk for cervical herniated intervertebral disc in physicians: A retrospective nationwide population-based cohort study with claims analysis
【24h】

Higher risk for cervical herniated intervertebral disc in physicians: A retrospective nationwide population-based cohort study with claims analysis

机译:医师颈椎间盘突出症的较高风险:一项基于全国人群的回顾性队列研究,并进行索赔分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is no study about cervical herniated intervertebral disc (cervical HIVD) in physicians in the literature; therefore, we conceived a retrospective nationwide, population-based cohort study to elucidate the topic. We identified 26,038 physicians, 33,057 non-physician healthcare providers (HCPs), and identical numbers of non-HCP references (i.e., general population). All cohorts matched a 1:1 ratio with age and gender, and each were chosen from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). We compared cervical HIVD risk among physicians, nonphysician HCPs, and non-HCP references and performed a follow-up between 2007 and 2011. We also made comparisons among physician specialists. Both physicians and nonphysician HCPs had higher cervical HIVD risk than non-HCP references (odds ratio [OR]: 1.356; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.162-1.582; OR: 1.383; 95% CI: 1.191-1.605, respectively). There was no significant difference of cervical HIVD risk between physicians and nonphysician HCPs. In the comparison among physician specialists, orthopedists had a higher cervical HIVD risk than other specialists, but the difference was not statistically significant (adjusted OR: 1.547; 95% CI: 0.782-3.061). Physicians are at higher cervical HIVD risk than the general population. Because unknown confounders could exist, further prospective studies are needed to identify possible causation.
机译:文献中尚无关于颈椎间盘突出症(宫颈HIVD)的研究。因此,我们构思了一项回顾性的全国性人群研究,以阐明这一主题。我们确定了26,038位医生,33,057位非医师保健提供者(HCP)和相同数量的非HCP推荐人(即普通人群)。所有队列的年龄和性别比例均为1:1,并且均选自台湾国家健康保险研究数据库(NHIRD)。我们比较了医师,非医师HCP和非HCP参考对象中子宫颈HIVD的风险,并在2007年至2011年之间进行了随访。我们还对医师之间进行了比较。医师和非医师HCP的宫颈HIVD风险均高于非HCP参比者(几率[OR]:1.356; 95%置信区间(CI):1.162-1.582; OR:1.383; 95%CI:1.191-1.605) 。医师和非医师HCP之间的子宫颈HIVD风险没有显着差异。在医师专科医生之间的比较中,骨科医生的宫颈HIVD风险高于其他专科医生,但差异无统计学意义(校正OR:1.547; 95%CI:0.782-3.061)。与普通人群相比,医师的子宫颈HIVD风险更高。由于可能存在未知的混杂因素,因此需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确定可能的因果关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号