...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Dosimetric evaluation of incidental irradiation to the axilla during whole breast radiotherapy for patients with left-sided early breast cancer in the IMRT era
【24h】

Dosimetric evaluation of incidental irradiation to the axilla during whole breast radiotherapy for patients with left-sided early breast cancer in the IMRT era

机译:IMRT时代左侧早期乳腺癌患者全乳放疗期间腋窝偶然照射的剂量学评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric parameters for incidental irradiation to the axilla during whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Twenty left breast cancer patients treated with WBRT after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were enrolled in this study. Remnant breast tissue, 3 levels of the axilla, heart, and lung were delineated. We used 2 different radiotherapy methods: 3D-CRT with field-in-field technique and 7-field fixed-beam IMRT. The target coverage of IMRT was significantly better than that of 3D-CRT (D-mean: 49.72 +/- 0.64 Gy vs 50.24 +/- 0.66 Gy, P<0.001; V-45: 93.19 +/- 1.40% vs 98.59 +/- 0.30%, P<0.001; V-47.5: 86.43 +/- 2.72% vs 95.00 +/- 0.02%, P<0.001, for 3D-CRT and IMRT, respectively). In the IMRT plan, a lower dose was delivered to a wider region of the heart and lung. Significantly lower axillary irradiation was shown throughout each level of axilla by IMRT compared to 3D-CRT (D-mean for level I: 42.58 +/- 5.31 Gy vs 14.49 +/- 6.91 Gy, P<0.001; D-mean for level II: 26.25 +/- 10.43 Gy vs 3.41 +/- 3.11 Gy, P<0.001; D-mean for level III: 6.26 +/- 4.69 Gy vs 1.16 +/- 0.51 Gy, P<0.001; D-mean for total axilla: 33.9 +/- 6.89 Gy vs 9.96 +/- 5.21 Gy, P<0.001, for 3D-CRT and IMRT, respectively). In conclusion, the incidental dose delivered to the axilla was significantly lower for IMRT compared to 3D-CRT. Therefore, IMRT, which only includes the breast parenchyma, should be cautiously used in patients with limited positive sentinel lymph nodes and who do not undergo complete axillary lymph node dissection.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较在全乳放射治疗(WBRT)与3D立体适形放射治疗(3D-CRT)和强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)期间对腋窝进行偶然照射的剂量参数。本研究招募了20名在保乳手术(BCS)后接受WBRT治疗的左乳腺癌患者。描绘了剩余的乳房组织,3个水平的腋窝,心脏和肺。我们使用了两种不同的放疗方法:采用现场技术的3D-CRT和7场固定束IMRT。 IMRT的目标覆盖率显着优于3D-CRT(D均值:49.72 +/- 0.64 Gy vs 50.24 +/- 0.66 Gy,P <0.001; V-45:93.19 +/- 1.40%vs 98.59 + +/- 0.30%,P <0.001; V-47.5:86.43 +/- 2.72%,而3D-CRT和IMRT分别为95.00 +/- 0.02%,P <0.001)。在IMRT计划中,较低的剂量被输送到心脏和肺的较宽区域。与3D-CRT相比,IMRT在每个腋窝水平上均显示出较低的腋窝照射(I级的D均值:42.58 +/- 5.31 Gy vs 14.49 +/- 6.91 Gy,P <0.001; II级的D均值:26.25 +/- 10.43 Gy vs 3.41 +/- 3.11 Gy,P <0.001; III级D值:6.26 +/- 4.69 Gy vs 1.16 +/- 0.51 Gy,P <0.001;总腋窝D值:对于3D-CRT和IMRT,分别为33.9 +/- 6.89 Gy和9.96 +/- 5.21 Gy,P <0.001)。总之,与3D-CRT相比,IMRT输送至腋窝的偶然剂量显着降低。因此,IMRT仅包括乳房实质,对于前哨淋巴结阳性有限且未进行腋窝淋巴结清扫的患者应谨慎使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号