首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Efficacy of a New Blind Insertion Technique of Arndt Endobronchial Blocker for Lung Isolation: Comparison With Conventional Bronchoscope-Guided Insertion TechniqueA Pilot Study
【24h】

Efficacy of a New Blind Insertion Technique of Arndt Endobronchial Blocker for Lung Isolation: Comparison With Conventional Bronchoscope-Guided Insertion TechniqueA Pilot Study

机译:Arndt支气管内阻滞剂新盲插入技术对肺隔离的功效:与传统支气管镜引导下插入技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study aimed to find other methods of blind insertion of Arndt endobronchial blocker (AEB) for lung isolation when a fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) is unavailable.We compared the effectiveness and safety of 3 insertion techniques of AEB: Gum elastic bougie (GEB)-, bougie combined with cricoid displacing (BCD)-, and fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB)-guided insertion. Seventy-eight patients undergoing esophageal procedure and requiring left thoracotomy were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: GEB group, BCD group, and FOB group. We recorded the successful placement of AEBs at first attempt, placement time, malposition of AEBs in supine and lateral decubitus position, the bronchus injury score, and other complications.The successful placement of AEB for the first attempt was 22/26, 25/26, and 26/26 patients in GEB, BCD, and FOB groups, respectively. The placement times in GEB and BCD groups were longer than those in the FOB group (P<0.05). AEB malposition occurred in 1/26, 2/26, 1/26 patients after lateral decubitus position, and AEBs were repositioned in 5/26, 3/26, 1/26 patients by FOB due to poor lung isolation in GEB, BCD, and FOB groups, respectively. There was no difference for the bronchus injury scores and other complications among 3 groups (P>0.05).Bougie and cricoid displacing-guided blind insertion of AEB seems to be a novel method, which is an effective and safe alternative when FOB was unavailable.
机译:本研究旨在寻找无法使用光纤支气管镜(FOB)时盲目插入Arndt支气管内阻滞剂(AEB)进行肺隔离的其他方法。 ,bougie结合环状置换(BCD)和光纤支气管镜(FOB)引导的插入。接受食管手术并需要左胸廓切开术的78例患者被随机分配到3组中的1组:GEB组,BCD组和FOB组。我们记录了首次尝试成功放置AEB,放置时间,仰卧和侧卧位AEB位置不正确,支气管损伤评分以及其他并发症。第一次尝试成功放置AEB的次数为22 / 26、25 / 26分别为GEB,BCD和FOB组的26/26患者。 GEB和BCD组的放置时间比FOB组长(P <0.05)。侧卧位后发生AEB位置不正的患者分别为1 / 26、2 / 26、1 / 26;由于GEB,BCD中肺部隔离不良,FOB将AEB重新定位于5 / 26、3 / 26、1 / 26患者。和FOB组。 3组之间的支气管损伤评分和其他并发症无差异(P> 0.05)。布吉和环行置换引导盲注AEB似乎是一种新颖的方法,当无法使用FOB时是一种安全有效的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号