首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.
【24h】

Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.

机译:前列腺床放射疗法的3D保形与强度调制计划技术的剂量学和放射生物学比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer improves biochemical and clinical disease-free survival. While comparisons in intact prostate cancer show a benefit for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) over 3D conformal planning, this has not been studied for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (RT). This study compares normal tissue and target dosimetry and radiobiological modeling of IMRT vs. 3D conformal planning in the postoperative setting. 3D conformal plans were designed for 15 patients who had been treated with IMRT planning for salvage post-prostatectomy RT. The same computed tomography (CT) and targetormal structure contours, as well as prescription dose, was used for both IMRT and 3D plans. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were calculated based on the dose given to the bladder and rectum by both plans. Dose-volume histogram and NTCP data were compared by paired t-test. Bladder and rectal sparing were improved with IMRT planning compared to 3D conformal planning. The volume of the bladder receiving at least 75% (V75) and 50% (V50) of the dose was significantly reduced by 28% and 17%, respectively (p = 0.002 and 0.037). Rectal dose was similarly reduced, V75 by 33% and V50 by 17% (p = 0.001 and 0.004). While there was no difference in the volume of rectum receiving at least 65 Gy (V65), IMRT planning significant reduced the volume receiving 40 Gy or more (V40, p = 0.009). Bladder V40 and V65 were not significantly different between planning modalities. Despite these dosimetric differences, there was no significant difference in the NTCP for either bladder or rectal injury. IMRT planning reduces the volume of bladder and rectum receiving high doses during post-prostatectomy RT. Because of relatively low doses given to the bladder and rectum, there was no statistically significant improvement in NTCP between the 3D conformal and IMRT plans.
机译:局部晚期前列腺癌的辅助放疗可改善生化和临床无病生存期。尽管完整前列腺癌的比较显示出强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)优于3D保形规划,但尚未进行前列腺切除术后放射治疗(RT)的研究。这项研究比较了术后组织中IMRT与3D保形计划的正常组织和目标剂量以及放射生物学建模。为15例接受IMRT计划治疗的患者设计了3D保形计划,计划进行前列腺切除术后RT抢救。 IMRT和3D计划均使用相同的计算机断层扫描(CT)和目标/正常结构轮廓以及处方剂量。两种计划均基于给予膀胱和直肠的剂量计算正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)。通过配对t检验比较剂量-体积直方图和NTCP数据。与3D保形计划相比,IMRT计划改善了膀胱和直肠保留。接受至少75%(V75)和50%(V50)剂量的膀胱体积分别显着减少了28%和17%(p = 0.002和0.037)。直肠剂量也同样减少,V75降低33%,V50降低17%(p = 0.001和0.004)。尽管接受至少65 Gy(V65)的直肠体积没有差异,但IMRT计划显着减少了接受40 Gy或更多的直肠体积(V40,p = 0.009)。膀胱V40和V65在计划方式之间没有显着差异。尽管存在这些剂量上的差异,但膀胱或直肠损伤的NTCP差异均无统计学意义。 IMRT计划可减少前列腺切除术后RT期间接受大剂量膀胱和直肠的体积。由于给予膀胱和直肠的剂量相对较低,因此3D保形和IMRT计划之间的NTCP没有统计上的显着改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号