首页> 外文会议>World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering >A dosimetric quality assessment of 6 MV versus 15 MV photon beam plans for prostate intensity modulated radiation therapy
【24h】

A dosimetric quality assessment of 6 MV versus 15 MV photon beam plans for prostate intensity modulated radiation therapy

机译:用于前列腺强度调制放射治疗的6 MV与15 MV光子束计划的剂量学质量评估

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: To compare the dosimetric quality assessments of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans generated by 6 MV and 15 MV photon energies for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 30 patients treated for localized prostate cancer using IMRT to 66 Gy in 33 fractions between May 2008 and March 2010. For inverse IMRT treatment planning, we used a 7-coplanar non opposed beam arrangement angles. To evaluate that the dosimetric quality assessment among plans are due only to energy selection, the beam arrangement, number of beam, and dose constraints were kept constant for all plans. The plan quality was determined by the measures of coverage, homogeneity, and conformity. Tumor coverage was measured using the planning target volume (PTV) and the clinical target volume (CTV) receiving 95%, 100% and 105% of the prescribed dose. Homogeneity was measured using the sigma index of the PTV and CTV. Conformity was measured using the lesion coverage factor, healthy tissue conformity index, and the conformity number. Results: Our results show a comparable coverage of PTV and CTV for both energies. The mean volume of PTV V_(95%) was 95.0±0.3% and 95.6±0.2% for the 6 MV and the 15 MV plans, respectively. For homogeneity between 6 MV and 15 MV plan, the mean PTV sigma index and the mean CTV sigma index was 2.21 Gy (95% confidence interval) and 2.54 Gy, and 1.08 Gy and 1.21Gy. The mean conformity number was 0.84 and 0.79, respectively. Conclusion: Our study has measures of coverage, homogeneity, and conformity for IMRT plans of prostate cancer using 6MV and 15 MV photon beam. We show that the differences in PTV and CTV coverage seen between 6 MV and 15 MV plans are not very significant. However, the homogeneity and conformity for 6 MV IMRT plans is better than 15 MV.
机译:目的:比较由6 MV和15 MV光子能量产生的强度调制放射治疗计划对前列腺癌的剂量学质量评估。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2008年5月至2010年3月之间使用IMRT治疗33例66 Gy的30例接受IMRT治疗的局部前列腺癌患者的数据。对于IMRT反向治疗计划,我们使用7个共面的非对置射束布置角度。为了评估计划之间的剂量质量评估仅是由于能量选择而引起的,对于所有计划,射束布置,射束数量和剂量约束均保持恒定。计划质量由覆盖率,同质性和一致性的度量确定。使用计划目标体积(PTV)和临床目标体积(CTV)分别接受规定剂量的95%,100%和105%的剂量来测量肿瘤的覆盖率。使用PTV和CTV的sigma指数测量同质性。使用病变覆盖率,健康组织合格指数和合格数量来测量合格性。结果:我们的结果表明,两种能量的PTV和CTV覆盖率均相当。对于6 MV和15 MV计划,PTV V_(95%)的平均体积分别为95.0±0.3%和95.6±0.2%。对于6 MV和15 MV计划之间的同质性,平均PTV sigma指数和平均CTV sigma指数为2.21 Gy(95%置信区间)和2.54 Gy,以及1.08 Gy和1.21Gy。平均合格数分别为0.84和0.79。结论:我们的研究使用6MV和15MV光子束对前列腺癌IMRT计划的覆盖率,均匀性和一致性进行了测量。我们表明,在6 MV和15 MV计划之间看到的PTV和CTV覆盖率差异不是很明显。但是,6 MV IMRT计划的同质性和一致性优于15 MV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号