...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Dosimetric Comparison between Two Different Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy Planning Techniques for Carcinoma of Breast Following Conservative Surgery
【24h】

Dosimetric Comparison between Two Different Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy Planning Techniques for Carcinoma of Breast Following Conservative Surgery

机译:保守性乳腺癌术后两种不同强度调制放射治疗与3D保形放射治疗计划技术的剂量学比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The anatomy of the chest wall is curved which makes it quite complicated to plan radiation therapy for breast cancer. There are different techniques for delivering external beam radiation therapy. Therefore, it is essential to know the technique by which we can render a better treatment. Aim: To compare and analyse three different planning techniques namely Three Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT), two field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and multiple field IMRT using dosimetric parameters.Materials and Methods: In this retrospective dosimetric study, we evaluated 10 breast cancer patients. For each patient, three plans namely 3DCRT, two field IMRT and multiple field IMRT (7 beams) were generated on the computed tomographic images using Oncentra Treatment Planning system. A dose of 50Gy in 25 fractions was prescribed to the Planning Target Volume (PTV). The plans were compared with each other on volume coverage (conformity and homogeneity) and organ-at-risk sparing. Paired t-test was used for identifying statistical differences between the plans. A significance level, p=5% or 0.05 was chosen.Results: The dose conformity was best by multiple field IMRT (p=0.0001). Both two field IMRT and multiple field IMRT provided more homogenous dose distribution with homogeneity index of 1.09±0.01 and 1.08±0.01 respectively when compared to 1.11±0.01 by 3DCRT (p=0.001 and 0.0001, respectively). D2 (dose received by 2% of the tumour volume), a measure of maximum dose was greater in 3DCRT. While dose to the critical organs was considerably less in both two field IMRT and 3DCRT than in multiple field IMRT, two field IMRT achieved lowest doses. Moreover, there was a substantial increase in the Monitor Units (MUs) for multiple field IMRT when compared with the other two techniques.Conclusion: Two field IMRT have the features intermediate of 3DCRT and multiple field IMRT. The two field IMRT is on the beneficial side with homogenous dose distribution in the target and less dose to the critical organs.
机译:胸壁的解剖结构是弯曲的,这使得计划放射治疗乳腺癌非常复杂。有多种技术可用于进行外部束放射治疗。因此,必须了解可以提供更好治疗的技术。目的:比较和分析三种不同的计划技术,即三维共形放射治疗(3DCRT),两场强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)和使用剂量参数的多场IMRT。材料和方法:在这项回顾性剂量研究中,我们评估了10名乳腺癌患者。对于每位患者,使用翁恩特拉治疗计划系统在计算的断层图像上生成三个计划,即3DCRT,两场IMRT和多场IMRT(7束)。按照计划目标体积(PTV)的规定,将25馏分中的50Gy剂量服用。在容量覆盖率(一致性和均匀性)和风险器官保留方面对计划进行了比较。配对t检验用于确定计划之间的统计差异。选择显着性水平,p = 5%或0.05。结果:通过多场IMRT(p = 0.0001)最佳剂量一致性。与3DCRT的1.11±0.01相比,两场IMRT和多场IMRT均提供了更均匀的剂量分布,均一性指数分别为1.09±0.01和1.08±0.01(分别为p = 0.001和0.0001)。 D2(接受2%肿瘤体积的剂量),在3DCRT中,最大剂量的量度较大。虽然在两场IMRT和3DCRT中对关键器官的剂量都比多场IMRT少得多,但两场IMRT的剂量最低。此外,与其他两种技术相比,多场IMRT的监视单元(MU)有了大幅增加。结论:两场IMRT具有3DCRT和多场IMRT的中间功能。两场IMRT的好处是靶中的剂量分布均匀,而对关键器官的剂量较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号